Timeline for Has this Google Maps imagery of 4 planes on a runway been tampered with? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2023 at 7:34 | comment | added | Snack Exchange | Since that's the date you saw the planes on Google Maps and not the date of their actual existence at the airport, I think writing down the date isn't really important. | |
| Jun 3, 2018 at 4:56 | comment | added | Pilothead | It was on Photo.SE last December. The question got 200 views, seven votes and the best answer also seven. I guess aviation types like photos better than photographers do. Of course, they were looking at red channel mismatch instead of 'tampering'. | |
| Jun 2, 2018 at 18:14 | comment | added | mgr326639 | True, point taken | |
| Jun 2, 2018 at 16:45 | comment | added | Federico | Personally I agree with the general assessment that this is off topic. you're asking "has been this image tampered?" i.e. something a informatic forensic investigator should answer, not a pilot or a mechanic. | |
| Jun 2, 2018 at 14:17 | comment | added | mgr326639 | Some people have marked this question as off-topic. In my opinion this question only becomes off-topic after you know the answer. I'm not sure if that should make the question off-topic. | |
| Jun 2, 2018 at 2:10 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jun 2, 2018 at 17:51 | |||||
| Jun 2, 2018 at 2:05 | history | closed |
fooot David Richerby user14897 TomMcW user13197 |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Jun 1, 2018 at 21:00 | answer | added | Camille Goudeseune | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 31, 2018 at 23:27 | comment | added | Michael | Looks like Google's new 3D imagery satellite is in operation... | |
| May 31, 2018 at 17:07 | answer | added | Logs | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 31, 2018 at 8:37 | comment | added | Saaru Lindestøkke | Link to a question on the Photo.SE site about the same image: photo.stackexchange.com/q/95153/9161 | |
| May 31, 2018 at 5:42 | comment | added | n_b | Didn't you know? The Netherlands has a group of 787s that not only do formation flying, they also do formation landing... No, it's not a thing, but I want it to be a thing. | |
| May 31, 2018 at 4:05 | comment | added | John C | Link to the Google Map in question: goo.gl/maps/KmtDUB4x7VK2 | |
| May 30, 2018 at 21:28 | history | edited | user14897 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body; edited title
|
| May 30, 2018 at 19:58 | comment | added | reirab | @ManuH A lot of Google's photography is aerial rather than satellite. However, you're correct that it's not taken at the same time. The aircraft or satellite would fly in a line taking photos which would later be stitched together. | |
| May 30, 2018 at 18:14 | vote | accept | mgr326639 | ||
| May 30, 2018 at 18:07 | comment | added | Manu H | Sattelites photography are usually not actual photos but rather a compilation of multiples photos not necesserally taken at the same time. | |
| May 30, 2018 at 17:41 | comment | added | Michael Seifert | If those are actually different planes, then the controllers at Schiphol are utterly failing at maintaining separation. | |
| May 30, 2018 at 17:29 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 30, 2018 at 22:11 | |||||
| May 30, 2018 at 17:14 | comment | added | vasin1987 | By the way it is a good catch!! | |
| May 30, 2018 at 16:27 | answer | added | abelenky | timeline score: 151 | |
| May 30, 2018 at 16:23 | comment | added | Dan | Just a note, but tamper strongly implies some kind of unauthorised/unlawful/nefarious alteration. If the planes aren't actually there, it's far more likely to be some kind of post-processing artefact rather than some kind of deliberate tampering. | |
| May 30, 2018 at 16:20 | review | First posts | |||
| May 30, 2018 at 17:14 | |||||
| May 30, 2018 at 16:19 | history | asked | mgr326639 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |