3
$\begingroup$

Has Gaia made the "Gaia Catalog of Nearby Stars" (GCNS) available for offline processing?

Ideally I'd like the full 100pc data set in a format that doesn't require any specialized libraries to parse, e.g. something like CSV.

I've found a pile of papers talking about work done with that data, and I think I've found a download link to a larger (~TiB) data set, as well as some online search tools (that are poorly documented and hard to use unless you already know how) but I've had no luck finding a copy of the 100pc GCNS.


Alternatively: all I really need is 3D location (however described), spectral class and (ideally) masses for bodes larger than brown dwarfs. Are there any other catalogs that have near complete data for that out to ~100pc that are readily available for off line processing?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You stand a better chance with the HIPPARCOS data. The dataset from the GAIA mission is huge and would take an enormous amount of time to download, plus consumer-level computers might have a hard time accessing it because it’s so large—actually, it’s broken in chunks, but a quick look at them reveals that even the chunks are huge! HIPPARCOS, on the other hand, is a smaller dataset. I’m not sure how complete it is, but for stars within 100 pc, I’m sure it’s good enough. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 30, 2021 at 22:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Interesting. From what references I can find, the GCNS is only about 300k objects to avoid those exact issues. HIPPARCOS does have the advantage of being easy to find, but seems to only have around 118k objects. -- Do you know of a source for mapping that data to common names? $\endgroup$
    – BCS
    Commented Dec 30, 2021 at 23:03
  • $\begingroup$ Most stars don’t have “common names,” but your best source would be the International Astronomical Union’s page: iau.org/public/themes/naming_stars as well as maybe Wikipedia. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 30, 2021 at 23:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @PierrePaquette I'm sure you are correct, but I also suspect the majority of the ones that do are in the set of stars I'm looking for data on. Also, in my use-case, dealing with named stars we eventual be a major requirement. $\endgroup$
    – BCS
    Commented Dec 30, 2021 at 23:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @PierrePaquette Also, doing a rather course test, HIPPARCOS seems to be somewhat incomplete even inside of ~100pc. I may or may not be able to live with that. TBD. I plotted running sums of stars by class, which should at least approximate $O(r^3)$. Plotted log-log, D and M class quickly fall off around 30pc with K and G following at about 50pc and 80pc respectively. See: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/… $\endgroup$
    – BCS
    Commented Dec 31, 2021 at 0:27

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

Perhaps I am late, but the GCNS is available via VizieR. The data can be both queried there and downloaded via FTP: https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/A+A/649/A6#/browse, theoretically it is also available via the Gaia-Archive (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/), at least according to an announcement dating 21/12/2021, but I did not manage to find the actual data. Anyway, I'm not sure whether you will find what you need solely based on the data in the GCNS.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ That looks like what I was looking for. OTOH whoever put that up seems to have botched the filenames, to say the least. The most relevant file J_A+A_649_A6_table1c.dat.gz.txt.gz, despite saying .gz twice is in fact uncompressed text. $\endgroup$
    – BCS
    Commented Jan 18, 2022 at 2:12
1
$\begingroup$

If you want to find the common star names for the stars in Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars - GCNS : J/A+A/649/A6 described above you can pen the file in TOPCAT and then do a cross match on the Simbad Server using TOPCATs built in X-Match interface to CDS.

However it may be better to filter the stars first to remove ones fainter than you are interested in - the number of stars more than doubles with each magnitude. The other thing to be aware of is that the Gaia data is incomplete for bright stars due to problems determining the centroid of the bright image.

The data table above also contains quite a number of stars shown with a G Mag of zero - which seems to be used where there is no data.

You can also use TOPCAT to save the data that was in FITS format into .CSV or other formats but beware of the information loss.

Depending on what you want to do there are lots of functions in TOPCAT that make life easy handling astronomical data. It can produce some pretty good plots as well.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .