Hubble measured the velocity of galaxies relative to Earth and determined that the galaxies were moving away from Earth. Speed increased with distance to Earth. This correlates well with the Big Bang theory, which was launched in the first half of the twentieth century. In the second half of the twentieth century, superclusters are discovered. For example, the Virgo Supercluster which is part of the bigger Laniakea Supercluster.

The movement of the galaxies inside the Laniakea and Perseus-Pisces Superclusters has now been mapped. It turns out that they move in all directions, both towards and away from Earth and The Milky Way. I'm having a hard time reconciling this with The Big Bang theory. If the gravity from The Great Attractor or the distant Vela Supercluster, ("Peculiar velocity") overrides The Hubble's flow, then Hubble would not be able to demonstrate that all galaxies were moving away from each other.

Should we look at the expansion of the universe in a larger perspective, that it is the Superclusters, and not the individual galaxies that are moving apart? But what was it then that Hubbel saw?

The Video is only 4:10 and illustrates the galactic movements within the supercluster.

Hubble measured the velocity of galaxies relative to Earth and determined that the galaxies were moving away from Earth. Speed increased with distance to Earth. This correlates well with the Big Bang theory, which was launched in the first half of the twentieth century. In the second half of the twentieth century, superclusters are discovered. For example, the Virgo Supercluster which is part of the bigger Laniakea Supercluster.

The movement of the galaxies inside the Laniakea and Perseus-Pisces Superclusters has now been mapped. It turns out that they move in all directions, both towards and away from Earth and The Milky Way. I'm having a hard time reconciling this with The Big Bang theory. If the gravity from The Great Attractor or the distant Vela Supercluster, ("Peculiar velocity") overrides The Hubble's flow, then Hubble would not be able to demonstrate that all galaxies were moving away from each other.

Should we look at the expansion of the universe in a bigger perspective, that it is the Superclusters, and not the individual galaxies that are moving apart? But what was it then that Hubbel saw? Did he observed galaxies beyond the Laniakea and Vela superclusters?

The Video is only 4:10 and illustrates the galactic movements within the supercluster.

Hubble measured the velocity of galaxies relative to Earth and determined that the galaxies were moving away from Earth. Speed increased with distance to Earth. This correlates well with the Big Bang theory, which was launched in the first half of the twentieth century. In the second half of the twentieth century, superclusters are discovered. For example, the Virgo Supercluster which is part of the bigger Laniakea Supercluster.

The movement of the galaxies inside the Laniakea and Perseus-Pisces Superclusters has now been mapped. It turns out that they move in all directions, both towards and away from Earth and The Milky Way. I'm having a hard time reconciling this with The Big Bang theory. If the gravity from The Great Attractor or the distant Vela Supercluster, ("Peculiar velocity") overrides The Hubble's flow, then Hubble would not be able to demonstrate that all galaxies were moving away from each other.

Should we look at the expansion of the universe in a larger perspective, that it is the Superclusters, and not the individual galaxies that are moving apart? But what was it then that Hubbel saw?

Hubble measured the velocity of galaxies relative to Earth and determined that the galaxies were moving away from Earth. Speed increased with distance to Earth. This correlates well with the Big Bang theory, which was launched in the first half of the twentieth century. In the second half of the twentieth century, superclusters are discovered. For example, the Virgo Supercluster which is part of the bigger Laniakea Supercluster.

The movement of the galaxies inside the Laniakea and Perseus-Pisces Superclusters has now been mapped. It turns out that they move in all directions, both towards and away from Earth and The Milky Way. I'm having a hard time reconciling this with The Big Bang theory. If the gravity from The Great Attractor or the distant Vela Supercluster, ("Peculiar velocity") overrides The Hubble's flow, then Hubble would not be able to demonstrate that all galaxies were moving away from each other.

Should we look at the expansion of the universe in a larger perspective, that it is the Superclusters, and not the individual galaxies that are moving apart? But what was it then that Hubbel saw?

The Video is only 4:10 and illustrates the galactic movements within the supercluster.