Timeline for Could the Methuselah star be evidence that there was a universe before this one?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2023 at 0:43 | comment | added | Joshua | I find this question interesting mainly for the demonstration of a subtract operation exhibiting total loss of precision. | |
| Nov 4, 2023 at 0:15 | history | became hot network question | |||
| S Nov 3, 2023 at 23:08 | history | edited | benrg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
add link to star description
|
| S Nov 3, 2023 at 23:08 | history | suggested | creidhne | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
add link to star description
|
| Nov 3, 2023 at 21:46 | comment | added | user52681 | @ProfRob The link you have points out that it is surprising a star like Methusala could form so soon after the Big Bang.Perhaps the explanation relates to why galaxies are too large too soon. | |
| Nov 3, 2023 at 21:43 | comment | added | user52681 | @James K Christopher James Huff gave a reasonable answer below that shows my premise is wrong. Methuselah would be expected to have higher metallicity if I had been correct. | |
| Nov 3, 2023 at 19:19 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 4, 2023 at 21:17 | |||||
| Nov 3, 2023 at 19:03 | comment | added | James K | I’m voting to close this question because the premise is false, so no reasonable answer is possible. | |
| Nov 3, 2023 at 17:39 | answer | added | Christopher James Huff | timeline score: 27 | |
| Nov 3, 2023 at 16:51 | comment | added | ProfRob | Related: astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/19446/… | |
| Nov 3, 2023 at 16:40 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 3, 2023 at 23:08 | |||||
| Nov 3, 2023 at 16:15 | history | asked | user52681 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |