Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

12
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The absorbed energy is probably the real hard part. The gravitational waves will have to couple somehow to acoustic waves. $\endgroup$
    – fraxinus
    Commented Oct 6, 2020 at 8:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JanStulter The Earth is bigger than humans. The distortion of an object by a given strain is proportional to the size of the object. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 6, 2020 at 8:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @SteveLinton: I somehow assumed that the distortion induced by gravity-waves is independent of the size of the object. Thinking of ocean waves, they will lift an oil-tanker the same way as a human body, when they pass underneath these "objects". I intuitively thought that gravity-waves passing through space time would "ripple" through objects the same way. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 6, 2020 at 9:29
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @JanStuller think instead of sound waves in water. The water is alternately compressed and stretched. A soft jellyfish floating in the water will be compressed or stretched proportionately to its size. Another consideration is that the wavelength is pretty large, at least comparable to the Earth. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 6, 2020 at 15:27
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @JanStuller The closer they orbit (and therefore the faster) the more intense the gravity waves they emit (by quite a lot) and also the higher frequency, which makes them easier to detect. If our detectors were more sensitive and to lower frequencies, we could detect them earlier. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 7, 2020 at 20:46