Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 13, 2020 at 2:23 comment added alexchandel The "Heisenberg/virtual-particle" explanation is completely false. It was made up for pop-sci, and has no correspondence at all to the underlying math/physics.
Apr 26, 2019 at 7:19 comment added Alchimista Why this should happen as such that the negative whatever it is fall inside? By this picture one would expect an average null effect.
Apr 25, 2019 at 21:47 comment added user27815 @KellyS.French If you want to harvest some negative energy density stuff, you would be better off playing with flying mirrors and conductive plates (see Casimir effect). It won't work either, but at least you don't need a black hole for it. :)
Apr 25, 2019 at 21:10 comment added Kelly S. French This answer triggered a thought I couldn't help but share. The concept of an Alcubierre warp drive requires said 'exotic matter', so is it theoretically possible to take advantage of this to jump-start a warp drive? Or is this not the same type of exotic matter / energy?
Apr 25, 2019 at 17:43 comment added user27815 @Sidney antimatter still has positive mass, when a positron meets an electron, we call it annihilation, but the result is not zero, it is two gamma photons of equivalent relativistic mass.
Apr 25, 2019 at 17:38 comment added Sidney Pop-sci theorizing here, but is "exotic matter" actually necessary to balance this equation? If a virtual matter-antimatter pair self-instantiates and the anti-matter particle falls into the black hole while a regular-matter-particle escapes, shouldn't it annihilate a "particle's" (yes, I know black holes are weird™ and black hole particles aren't really a thing, that's why it's in quotes) worth of matter from the black hole, or has the black hole essentially forgot that it's constituent mass used to be composed of matter?
Apr 25, 2019 at 15:42 history edited user27815 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 29 characters in body
Apr 25, 2019 at 15:25 review First posts
Apr 25, 2019 at 15:31
Apr 25, 2019 at 15:24 history answered user27815 CC BY-SA 4.0