Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Toader, I D

Quantum Mechanics as a Carnapian Language

Authors: Iulian D. Toader

Abstract: The paper discusses Carnap's claim that a proper philosophical analysis of quantum mechanics, including a determination of whether its logic has to be revised, requires a rational reconstruction of the theory. Several articulations of the notion of rational reconstruction are recalled, followed by a brief analysis of two standard criticisms of Carnap's claim. The paper suggests that adopting infer… ▽ More The paper discusses Carnap's claim that a proper philosophical analysis of quantum mechanics, including a determination of whether its logic has to be revised, requires a rational reconstruction of the theory. Several articulations of the notion of rational reconstruction are recalled, followed by a brief analysis of two standard criticisms of Carnap's claim. The paper suggests that adopting inferentialism overcomes both criticisms, and then considers the possibility of formulating quantum mechanics as a Carnapian language with an inferentialist semantics. △ Less

Submitted 23 June, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: 10p, comments welcome! arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2310.14634

Rules and Meaning in Quantum Mechanics

Authors: Iulian D. Toader

Abstract: This book concerns the metasemantics of quantum mechanics (QM). Roughly, it pursues an investigation at an intersection of the philosophy of physics and the philosophy of semantics, and it offers a critical analysis of rival explanations of the semantic facts of standard QM. Two problems for such explanations are discussed: categoricity and permanence of rules. New results include 1) a reconstruct… ▽ More This book concerns the metasemantics of quantum mechanics (QM). Roughly, it pursues an investigation at an intersection of the philosophy of physics and the philosophy of semantics, and it offers a critical analysis of rival explanations of the semantic facts of standard QM. Two problems for such explanations are discussed: categoricity and permanence of rules. New results include 1) a reconstruction of Einstein's incompleteness argument, which concludes that a local, separable, and categorical QM cannot exist, 2) a reinterpretation of Bohr's principle of correspondence, grounded in the principle of permanence, 3) a meaning-variance argument for quantum logic, which follows a line of critical reflections initiated by Weyl, and 4) an argument for semantic indeterminacy leveled against inferentialism about QM, inspired by Carnap's work in the philosophy of classical logic. △ Less

Submitted 23 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 150 pages

Is Bohr's Correspondence Principle just Hankel's Principle of Permanence?

Authors: Iulian D. Toader

Abstract: No, but the paper argues that Bohr understood his correspondence principle, or at least an aspect of that principle expressed by the notion of rational generalization, as grounded in Hankel's principle of permanence, adapted to new historical and theoretical contexts. This is shown to illuminate some otherwise obscure aspects of Bohr's approach to quantum theory, as well as a seemingly strange cri… ▽ More No, but the paper argues that Bohr understood his correspondence principle, or at least an aspect of that principle expressed by the notion of rational generalization, as grounded in Hankel's principle of permanence, adapted to new historical and theoretical contexts. This is shown to illuminate some otherwise obscure aspects of Bohr's approach to quantum theory, as well as a seemingly strange criticism against this approach, due to Feyerabend and Bohm. △ Less

Submitted 22 November, 2023; v1 submitted 16 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 27 pages

Journal ref: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2024

On the Categoricity of Quantum Mechanics

Authors: Iulian D. Toader

Abstract: The paper offers an argument against an intuitive reading of the Stone-von Neumann theorem as a categoricity result, thereby pointing out that, against what is usually taken to be the case, this theorem does not entail any model-theoretical difference between the theories that validate it and those that don't. The paper offers an argument against an intuitive reading of the Stone-von Neumann theorem as a categoricity result, thereby pointing out that, against what is usually taken to be the case, this theorem does not entail any model-theoretical difference between the theories that validate it and those that don't. △ Less

Submitted 20 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: 20 pages

Journal ref: European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11, 1-14, 2021

Spacetime Singularities and Invariance

Authors: O. Cristi Stoica, Iulian D. Toader

Abstract: This paper explains why spacetime singularities do not constitute a breakdown of physical laws, and points out that the difference between the metrics at singularities and those outside of singularities is factual, rather than nomological. This paper explains why spacetime singularities do not constitute a breakdown of physical laws, and points out that the difference between the metrics at singularities and those outside of singularities is factual, rather than nomological. △ Less

Submitted 18 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Journal ref: Belgrade Philosophical Annual 29, 67-78, 2016

Carnap on Quantum Mechanics

Authors: Sebastian Horvat, Iulian D. Toader

Abstract: This entry reviews Rudolf Carnap's philosophical views on the quantum mechanics of his time. It also offers some thoughts on how Carnap might have reacted to some recent developments in the foundations of quantum mechanics. This entry reviews Rudolf Carnap's philosophical views on the quantum mechanics of his time. It also offers some thoughts on how Carnap might have reacted to some recent developments in the foundations of quantum mechanics. △ Less

Submitted 18 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: 9 pages

Einstein Completeness as Categoricity

Authors: Iulian D. Toader

Abstract: This paper provides an algebraic reconstruction of Einstein's own argument for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics -- the one that he thought did not make it into the EPR paper -- in order to clarify the assumptions that underlie an understanding of Einstein completeness as categoricity, the sense in which it is a type of descriptive completeness, and some of the various ways in which it has b… ▽ More This paper provides an algebraic reconstruction of Einstein's own argument for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics -- the one that he thought did not make it into the EPR paper -- in order to clarify the assumptions that underlie an understanding of Einstein completeness as categoricity, the sense in which it is a type of descriptive completeness, and some of the various ways in which it has been more often misconstrued. △ Less

Submitted 18 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Journal ref: Found Phys 53, 39 (2023)

An Alleged Tension between Non-classical Logics and Applied Classical Mathematics

Authors: Sebastian Horvat, Iulian D. Toader

Abstract: Timothy Williamson has recently argued that the applicability of classical mathematics in the natural and social sciences raises a problem for the endorsement, in non-mathematical domains, of a wide range of non-classical logics. We first reconstruct his argument and present its restriction to the case of quantum logic (QL). Then we show that there is no problematic tension between the applicabili… ▽ More Timothy Williamson has recently argued that the applicability of classical mathematics in the natural and social sciences raises a problem for the endorsement, in non-mathematical domains, of a wide range of non-classical logics. We first reconstruct his argument and present its restriction to the case of quantum logic (QL). Then we show that there is no problematic tension between the applicability of classical mathematical models to quantum phenomena and the endorsement of QL in the reasoning about the latter. Once we identify the premise in Williamson's argument that turns out to be false when restricted to QL, we argue that the same premise fails for a wider variety of non-classical logics. In the end, we use our discussion to draw some general lessons concerning the relationship between applied logic and applied mathematics. △ Less

Submitted 1 November, 2023; v1 submitted 17 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: 23 pages

Journal ref: The Philosophical Quarterly (2024): pqad125

Quantum logic and meaning

Authors: Sebastian Horvat, Iulian D. Toader

Abstract: This paper gives a formulation of quantum logic in the abstract algebraic setting laid out by Dunn and Hardegree (2001). On this basis, it provides a comparative analysis of viable quantum logical bivalent semantics and their classical counterparts, thereby showing that the truth-functional status of classical and quantum connectives is not as different as usually thought. Then it points out that… ▽ More This paper gives a formulation of quantum logic in the abstract algebraic setting laid out by Dunn and Hardegree (2001). On this basis, it provides a comparative analysis of viable quantum logical bivalent semantics and their classical counterparts, thereby showing that the truth-functional status of classical and quantum connectives is not as different as usually thought. Then it points out that bivalent semantics for quantum logic - compatible with realism about quantum mechanics - can be maintained, albeit at the price of truth-functionality. Finally, but more importantly, the paper significantly improves on Hellman's argument (1980) that this lack of truth-functionality entails a change of meaning between classical and quantum connectives. △ Less

Submitted 4 July, 2024; v1 submitted 17 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: 29 pages