Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Vetta, A

$k$-Leaf Powers Cannot be Characterized by a Finite Set of Forbidden Induced Subgraphs for $k \geq 5$

Authors: Max Dupré la Tour, Manuel Lafond, Ndiamé Ndiaye, Adrian Vetta

Abstract: A graph $G=(V,E)$ is a $k$-leaf power if there is a tree $T$ whose leaves are the vertices of $G$ with the property that a pair of leaves $u$ and $v$ induce an edge in $G$ if and only if they are distance at most $k$ apart in $T$. For $k\le 4$, it is known that there exists a finite set $F_k$ of graphs such that the class $L(k)$ of $k$-leaf power graphs is characterized as the set of strongly chor… ▽ More A graph $G=(V,E)$ is a $k$-leaf power if there is a tree $T$ whose leaves are the vertices of $G$ with the property that a pair of leaves $u$ and $v$ induce an edge in $G$ if and only if they are distance at most $k$ apart in $T$. For $k\le 4$, it is known that there exists a finite set $F_k$ of graphs such that the class $L(k)$ of $k$-leaf power graphs is characterized as the set of strongly chordal graphs that do not contain any graph in $F_k$ as an induced subgraph. We prove no such characterization holds for $k\ge 5$. That is, for any $k\ge 5$, there is no finite set $F_k$ of graphs such that $L(k)$ is equivalent to the set of strongly chordal graphs that do not contain as an induced subgraph any graph in $F_k$. △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

One n Remains to Settle the Tree Conjecture

Authors: Jack Dippel, Adrian Vetta

Abstract: In the famous network creation game of Fabrikant et al. a set of agents play a game to build a connected graph. The $n$ agents form the vertex set $V$ of the graph and each vertex $v\in V$ buys a set $E_v$ of edges inducing a graph $G=(V,\bigcup\limits_{v\in V} E_v)$. The private objective of each vertex is to minimize the sum of its building cost (the cost of the edges it buys) plus its connectio… ▽ More In the famous network creation game of Fabrikant et al. a set of agents play a game to build a connected graph. The $n$ agents form the vertex set $V$ of the graph and each vertex $v\in V$ buys a set $E_v$ of edges inducing a graph $G=(V,\bigcup\limits_{v\in V} E_v)$. The private objective of each vertex is to minimize the sum of its building cost (the cost of the edges it buys) plus its connection cost (the total distance from itself to every other vertex). Given a cost of $α$ for each individual edge, a long-standing conjecture, called the tree conjecture, states that if $α> n$ then every Nash equilibrium graph in the game is a spanning tree. After a plethora of work, it is known that the conjecture holds for any $α>3n-3$. In this paper we prove the tree conjecture holds for $α>2n$. This reduces by half the open range for $α$ with only $[n, 2n)$ remaining in order to settle the conjecture. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Penalties and Rewards for Fair Learning in Paired Kidney Exchange Programs

Authors: Margarida Carvalho, Alison Caulfield, Yi Lin, Adrian Vetta

Abstract: A kidney exchange program, also called a kidney paired donation program, can be viewed as a repeated, dynamic trading and allocation mechanism. This suggests that a dynamic algorithm for transplant exchange selection may have superior performance in comparison to the repeated use of a static algorithm. We confirm this hypothesis using a full scale simulation of the Canadian Kidney Paired Donation… ▽ More A kidney exchange program, also called a kidney paired donation program, can be viewed as a repeated, dynamic trading and allocation mechanism. This suggests that a dynamic algorithm for transplant exchange selection may have superior performance in comparison to the repeated use of a static algorithm. We confirm this hypothesis using a full scale simulation of the Canadian Kidney Paired Donation Program: learning algorithms, that attempt to learn optimal patient-donor weights in advance via dynamic simulations, do lead to improved outcomes. Specifically, our learning algorithms, designed with the objective of fairness (that is, equity in terms of transplant accessibility across cPRA groups), also lead to an increased number of transplants and shorter average waiting times. Indeed, our highest performing learning algorithm improves egalitarian fairness by 10% whilst also increasing the number of transplants by 6% and decreasing waiting times by 24%. However, our main result is much more surprising. We find that the most critical factor in determining the performance of a kidney exchange program is not the judicious assignment of positive weights (rewards) to patient-donor pairs. Rather, the key factor in increasing the number of transplants, decreasing waiting times and improving group fairness is the judicious assignment of a negative weight (penalty) to the small number of non-directed donors in the kidney exchange program. △ Less

Submitted 23 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: Shorter version accepted in WINE 2023

The Price of Anarchy of the Asymmetric One-Sided Allocation Problem

Authors: Sissi Jiang, Ndiame Ndiaye, Adrian Vetta, Eggie Wu

Abstract: We study fair mechanisms for the (asymmetric) one-sided allocation problem with m items and n multi-unit demand agents with additive, unit-sum valuations. The symmetric case (m=n), the one-sided matching problem, has been studied extensively for the class of unit demand agents, in particular with respect to the folklore Random Priority mechanism and the Probabilistic Serial mechanism, introduced b… ▽ More We study fair mechanisms for the (asymmetric) one-sided allocation problem with m items and n multi-unit demand agents with additive, unit-sum valuations. The symmetric case (m=n), the one-sided matching problem, has been studied extensively for the class of unit demand agents, in particular with respect to the folklore Random Priority mechanism and the Probabilistic Serial mechanism, introduced by Bogomolnaia and Moulin. Under the assumption of unit-sum valuation functions, Christodoulou et al. proved that the price of anarchy is $Θ(\sqrt{n})$ in the one-sided matching problem for both the Random Priority and Probabilistic Serial mechanisms. Whilst both Random Priority and Probabilistic Serial are ordinal mechanisms, these approximation guarantees are the best possible even for the broader class of cardinal mechanisms. To extend these results to the general setting there are two technical obstacles. One, asymmetry ($m\neq n$) is problematic especially when the number of items is much greater than the number of items. Two, it is necessary to study multi-unit demand agents rather than simply unit demand agents. Our approach is to study a cardinal mechanism variant of Probabilistic Serial, which we call Cardinal Probabilistic Serial. We present structural theorems for this mechanism and use them to obtain bounds on the price of anarchy. Our first main result is an upper bound of $O(\sqrt{n}\cdot \log m)$ on the price of anarchy for the asymmetric one-sided allocation problem with multi-unit demand agents. This upper bound applies to Probabilistic Serial as well and there is a complementary lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ for any fair mechanism. Our second main result is that the price of anarchy degrades with the number of items. Specifically, a logarithmic dependence on the number of items is necessary for both mechanisms. △ Less

Submitted 13 May, 2023; v1 submitted 3 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: 32 pages, 4 figures

Descending the Stable Matching Lattice: How many Strategic Agents are required to turn Pessimality to Optimality?

Authors: Ndiame Ndiaye, Sergey Norin, Adrian Vetta

Abstract: The set of stable matchings induces a distributive lattice. The supremum of the stable matching lattice is the boy-optimal (girl-pessimal) stable matching and the infimum is the girl-optimal (boy-pessimal) stable matching. The classical boy-proposal deferred-acceptance algorithm returns the supremum of the lattice, that is, the boy-optimal stable matching. In this paper, we study the smallest grou… ▽ More The set of stable matchings induces a distributive lattice. The supremum of the stable matching lattice is the boy-optimal (girl-pessimal) stable matching and the infimum is the girl-optimal (boy-pessimal) stable matching. The classical boy-proposal deferred-acceptance algorithm returns the supremum of the lattice, that is, the boy-optimal stable matching. In this paper, we study the smallest group of girls, called the {\em minimum winning coalition of girls}, that can act strategically, but independently, to force the boy-proposal deferred-acceptance algorithm to output the girl-optimal stable matching. We characterize the minimum winning coalition in terms of stable matching rotations and show that its cardinality can take on any value between $0$ and $\left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor$, for instances with $n$ boys and $n$ girls. Our main result is that, for the random matching model, the expected cardinality of the minimum winning coalition is $(\frac{1}{2}+o(1))\log{n}$. This resolves a conjecture of Kupfer \cite{Kup18}. △ Less

Submitted 11 July, 2021; v1 submitted 30 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Large Supports are required for Well-Supported Nash Equilibria

Authors: Yogesh Anbalagan, Hao Huang, Shachar Lovett, Sergey Norin, Adrian Vetta, Hehui Wu

Abstract: We prove that for any constant $k$ and any $ε<1$, there exist bimatrix win-lose games for which every $ε$-WSNE requires supports of cardinality greater than $k$. To do this, we provide a graph-theoretic characterization of win-lose games that possess $ε$-WSNE with constant cardinality supports. We then apply a result in additive number theory of Haight to construct win-lose games that do not satis… ▽ More We prove that for any constant $k$ and any $ε<1$, there exist bimatrix win-lose games for which every $ε$-WSNE requires supports of cardinality greater than $k$. To do this, we provide a graph-theoretic characterization of win-lose games that possess $ε$-WSNE with constant cardinality supports. We then apply a result in additive number theory of Haight to construct win-lose games that do not satisfy the requirements of the characterization. These constructions disprove graph theoretic conjectures of Daskalakis, Mehta and Papadimitriou, and Myers. △ Less

Submitted 14 April, 2015; originally announced April 2015.

Coalition Games on Interaction Graphs: A Horticultural Perspective

Authors: Nicolas Bousquet, Zhentao Li, Adrian Vetta

Abstract: We examine cooperative games where the viability of a coalition is determined by whether or not its members have the ability to communicate amongst themselves independently of non-members. This necessary condition for viability was proposed by Myerson (1977) and is modeled via an interaction graph $G=(V,E)$; a coalition $S\subseteq V$ is then viable if and only if the induced graph $G[S]$ is conne… ▽ More We examine cooperative games where the viability of a coalition is determined by whether or not its members have the ability to communicate amongst themselves independently of non-members. This necessary condition for viability was proposed by Myerson (1977) and is modeled via an interaction graph $G=(V,E)$; a coalition $S\subseteq V$ is then viable if and only if the induced graph $G[S]$ is connected. The non-emptiness of the core of a coalition game can be tested by a well-known covering LP. Moreover, the integrality gap of its dual packing LP defines exactly the multiplicative least-core and the relative cost of stability of the coalition game. This gap is upper bounded by the packing-covering ratio which, for graphical coalition games, is known to be at most the treewidth of the interaction graph plus one (Meir et al. 2013). We examine the packing-covering ratio and integrality gaps of graphical coalition games in more detail. We introduce the thicket parameter of a graph, and prove it precisely measures the packing-covering ratio. It also approximately measures the primal and dual integrality gaps. The thicket number provides an upper bound of both integrality gaps. Moreover we show that for any interaction graph, the primal integrality gap is, in the worst case, linear in terms of the thicket number while the dual integrality gap is polynomial in terms of it. At the heart of our results, is a graph theoretic minmax theorem showing the thicket number is equal to the minimum width of a vine decomposition of the coalition graph (a vine decomposition is a generalization of a tree decomposition). We also explain how the thicket number relates to the VC-dimension of the set system produced by the game. △ Less

Submitted 26 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.