-
Field Knowledge as a Dual to Distributed Knowledge: A Characterization by Weighted Modal Logic
Authors:
Xiaolong Liang,
Yì N. Wáng
Abstract:
The study of group knowledge concepts such as mutual, common, and distributed knowledge is well established within the discipline of epistemic logic. In this work, we incorporate epistemic abilities of agents to refine the formal definition of distributed knowledge and introduce a formal characterization of field knowledge. We propose that field knowledge serves as a dual to distributed knowledge.…
▽ More
The study of group knowledge concepts such as mutual, common, and distributed knowledge is well established within the discipline of epistemic logic. In this work, we incorporate epistemic abilities of agents to refine the formal definition of distributed knowledge and introduce a formal characterization of field knowledge. We propose that field knowledge serves as a dual to distributed knowledge. Our approach utilizes epistemic logics with various group knowledge constructs, interpreted through weighted models. We delve into the eight logics that stem from these considerations, explore their relative expressivity and develop sound and complete axiomatic systems.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Epistemic Logic over Similarity Graphs: Common, Distributed and Mutual Knowledge
Authors:
Xiaolong Liang,
Yì N. Wáng
Abstract:
In this paper, we delve into the study of epistemic logics, interpreted through similarity models based on weighted graphs. We explore eight languages that extend the traditional epistemic language by incorporating modalities of common, distributed, and mutual knowledge. The concept of individual knowledge is redefined under these similarity models. It is no longer just a matter of personal knowle…
▽ More
In this paper, we delve into the study of epistemic logics, interpreted through similarity models based on weighted graphs. We explore eight languages that extend the traditional epistemic language by incorporating modalities of common, distributed, and mutual knowledge. The concept of individual knowledge is redefined under these similarity models. It is no longer just a matter of personal knowledge, but is now enriched and understood as knowledge under the individual's epistemic ability. Common knowledge is presented as higher-order knowledge that is universally known to any degree, a definition that aligns with existing literature. We reframe distributed knowledge as a form of knowledge acquired by collectively leveraging the abilities of a group of agents. In contrast, mutual knowledge is defined as the knowledge obtained through the shared abilities of a group. We then focus on the resulting logics, examining their relative expressivity, semantic correspondence to the classical epistemic logic, proof systems and the computational complexity associated with the model checking problem and the satisfiability/validity problem. This paper offers significant insights into the logical analysis and understanding of these enriched forms of knowledge, contributing to the broader discourse on epistemic logic.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Simpler completeness proofs for modal logics with intersection
Authors:
Yì N. Wáng,
Thomas Ågotnes
Abstract:
There has been a significant interest in extending various modal logics with intersection, the most prominent examples being epistemic and doxastic logics with distributed knowledge. Completeness proofs for such logics tend to be complicated, in particular on model classes such as S5 like in standard epistemic logic, mainly due to the undefinability of intersection of modalities in standard modal…
▽ More
There has been a significant interest in extending various modal logics with intersection, the most prominent examples being epistemic and doxastic logics with distributed knowledge. Completeness proofs for such logics tend to be complicated, in particular on model classes such as S5 like in standard epistemic logic, mainly due to the undefinability of intersection of modalities in standard modal logics. A standard proof method for the S5 case was outlined in [8] and later explicated in more detail in [13], using an "unraveling-folding method" case to achieve a treelike model to deal with the problem of undefinability. This method, however, is not easily adapted to other logics, due to the level of detail and reliance on S5. In this paper we propose a simpler proof technique by building a treelike canonical model directly, which avoids the complications in the processes of unraveling and folding. We demonstrate the technique by showing completeness of the normal modal logics K, D, T, B, S4 and S5 extended with intersection modalities. Furthermore, these treelike canonical models are compatible with Fischer-Ladner-style closures, and we combine the methods to show the completeness of the mentioned logics further extended with transitive closure of union modalities known from PDL or epistemic logic. Some of these completeness results are new.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Resolving Distributed Knowledge
Authors:
Thomas Ågotnes,
Yì N. Wáng
Abstract:
Distributed knowledge is the sum of the knowledge in a group; what someone who is able to discern between two possible worlds whenever any member of the group can discern between them, would know. Sometimes distributed knowledge is referred to as the potential knowledge of a group, or the joint knowledge they could obtain if they had unlimited means of communication. In epistemic logic, the formul…
▽ More
Distributed knowledge is the sum of the knowledge in a group; what someone who is able to discern between two possible worlds whenever any member of the group can discern between them, would know. Sometimes distributed knowledge is referred to as the potential knowledge of a group, or the joint knowledge they could obtain if they had unlimited means of communication. In epistemic logic, the formula D_Gφ is intended to express the fact that group G has distributed knowledge of φ, that there is enough information in the group to infer φ. But this is not the same as reasoning about what happens if the members of the group share their information. In this paper we introduce an operator R_G, such that R_Gφ means that φ is true after G have shared all their information with each other - after G's distributed knowledge has been resolved. The R_G operators are called resolution operators. Semantically, we say that an expression R_Gφ is true iff φ is true in what van Benthem [11, p. 249] calls (G's) communication core; the model update obtained by removing links to states for members of G that are not linked by all members of G. We study logics with different combinations of resolution operators and operators for common and distributed knowledge. Of particular interest is the relationship between distributed and common knowledge. The main results are sound and complete axiomatizations.
△ Less
Submitted 23 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
Knowledge, Awareness, and Bisimulation
Authors:
Hans van Ditmarsch,
Tim French,
Fernando R. Velazquez-Quesada,
Yi N. Wang
Abstract:
We compare different epistemic notions in the presence of awareness of propositional variables: the logics of implicit knowledge (in which explicit knowledge is definable), explicit knowledge, and speculative knowledge. Different notions of bisimulation are suitable for these logics. We provide correspondence between bisimulation and modal equivalence on image-finite models for these logics. The l…
▽ More
We compare different epistemic notions in the presence of awareness of propositional variables: the logics of implicit knowledge (in which explicit knowledge is definable), explicit knowledge, and speculative knowledge. Different notions of bisimulation are suitable for these logics. We provide correspondence between bisimulation and modal equivalence on image-finite models for these logics. The logic of speculative knowledge is equally expressive as the logic of explicit knowledge, and the logic of implicit knowledge is more expressive than both. We also provide axiomatizations for the three logics -- only the one for speculative knowledge is novel. Then we move to the study of dynamics by recalling action models incorporating awareness. We show that any conceivable change of knowledge or awareness can be modelled in this setting, we give a complete axiomatization for the dynamic logic of implicit knowledge. The dynamic versions of all three logics are, surprising, equally expressive.
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2013;
originally announced October 2013.
