Showing 1–27 of 27 results for author: Rubin, S

Reusable Formal Verification of DAG-based Consensus Protocols

Authors: Nathalie Bertrand, Pranav Ghorpade, Sasha Rubin, Bernhard Scholz, Pavle Subotic

Abstract: DAG-based consensus protocols are being adoption by blockchain companies to decrease energy footprints and improve security. A DAG-based consensus protocol collaboratively constructs a partial order of blocks of transactions and produces linearly ordered blocks. The ubiquity and strategic importance of blockchains call for formal proof of the correctness of key components, namely, consensus protoc… ▽ More DAG-based consensus protocols are being adoption by blockchain companies to decrease energy footprints and improve security. A DAG-based consensus protocol collaboratively constructs a partial order of blocks of transactions and produces linearly ordered blocks. The ubiquity and strategic importance of blockchains call for formal proof of the correctness of key components, namely, consensus protocols. This paper presents a safety-proven formal specification of two DAG-based protocols. Our specification highlights several dissemination, DAG construction, and ordering variations that can be combined to express the two protocols. The formalization requires a refinement approach for modeling the consensus. In an abstract model, we first show the safety of DAG-based consensus on leader blocks and then further refine the specification to encompass all blocks for all processes. The TLA+ specification for a given protocol consists of 492-732 lines, and the proof system TLAPS verifies 2025-2294 obligations in 6-8 minutes. △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

The opportunities and risks of large language models in mental health

Authors: Hannah R. Lawrence, Renee A. Schneider, Susan B. Rubin, Maja J. Mataric, Daniel J. McDuff, Megan Jones Bell

Abstract: Global rates of mental health concerns are rising and there is increasing realization that existing models of mental healthcare will not adequately expand to meet the demand. With the emergence of large language models (LLMs) has come great optimism regarding their promise to create novel, large-scale solutions to support mental health. Despite their nascence, LLMs have already been applied to men… ▽ More Global rates of mental health concerns are rising and there is increasing realization that existing models of mental healthcare will not adequately expand to meet the demand. With the emergence of large language models (LLMs) has come great optimism regarding their promise to create novel, large-scale solutions to support mental health. Despite their nascence, LLMs have already been applied to mental health-related tasks. In this review, we summarize the extant literature on efforts to use LLMs to provide mental health education, assessment, and intervention and highlight key opportunities for positive impact in each area. We then highlight risks associated with LLMs application to mental health and encourage adoption of strategies to mitigate these risks. The urgent need for mental health support must be balanced with responsible development, testing, and deployment of mental health LLMs. Especially critical is ensuring that mental health LLMs are fine-tuned for mental health, enhance mental health equity, adhere to ethical standards, and that people, including those with lived experience with mental health concerns, are involved in all stages from development through deployment. Prioritizing these efforts will minimize potential harms to mental health and maximize the likelihood that LLMs will positively impact mental health globally. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2024; v1 submitted 21 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: 12 pages, 2 tables, 4 figures

Parameterized Model-checking of Discrete-Timed Networks and Symmetric-Broadcast Systems

Authors: Benjamin Aminof, Sasha Rubin, Francesco Spegni, Florian Zuleger

Abstract: We study the complexity of the model-checking problem for discrete-timed systems with arbitrarily many anonymous and identical contributors, with and without a distinguished "controller" process, communicating via synchronous rendezvous. Our work extends the seminal work on untimed systems by German and Sistla adding discrete-time clocks, thus allowing one to model more realistic protocols. For th… ▽ More We study the complexity of the model-checking problem for discrete-timed systems with arbitrarily many anonymous and identical contributors, with and without a distinguished "controller" process, communicating via synchronous rendezvous. Our work extends the seminal work on untimed systems by German and Sistla adding discrete-time clocks, thus allowing one to model more realistic protocols. For the case without a controller, we show that the systems can be efficiently simulated -- and vice versa -- by systems of untimed processes communicating via rendezvous and symmetric broadcast, which we call "RB-systems". Symmetric broadcast is a novel communication primitive that, like ordinary asymmetric broadcast, allows all processes to synchronize without distinction between sender/receiver processes. We show that the complexity of the parameterized model-checking problem for safety specifications is pspace-complete, and for liveness specifications it is decidable in exptime. The latter result required automata theory, rational linear programming, and geometric reasoning for solving certain reachability questions in a new variant of vector addition systems called "vector rendezvous systems". We believe such proof techniques are of independent interest and will be useful in solving related problems. For the case with a controller, we show that the parameterized model-checking problems for RB-systems and systems with asymmetric broadcast are inter-reducible. This implies that for discrete timed-networks with a controller the parameterized model-checking problem is undecidable for liveness specifications. Our work exploits the intimate connection between discrete-timed systems and systems of processes communicating via broadcast. This allows us to prove decidability results for liveness properties of parameterized timed-systems, as well as extend work from untimed systems to timed systems. △ Less

Submitted 3 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

LTLf Synthesis Under Environment Specifications for Reachability and Safety Properties

Authors: Benjamin Aminof, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Antonio Di Stasio, Hugo Francon, Sasha Rubin, Shufang Zhu

Abstract: In this paper, we study LTLf synthesis under environment specifications for arbitrary reachability and safety properties. We consider both kinds of properties for both agent tasks and environment specifications, providing a complete landscape of synthesis algorithms. For each case, we devise a specific algorithm (optimal wrt complexity of the problem) and prove its correctness. The algorithms comb… ▽ More In this paper, we study LTLf synthesis under environment specifications for arbitrary reachability and safety properties. We consider both kinds of properties for both agent tasks and environment specifications, providing a complete landscape of synthesis algorithms. For each case, we devise a specific algorithm (optimal wrt complexity of the problem) and prove its correctness. The algorithms combine common building blocks in different ways. While some cases are already studied in literature others are studied here for the first time. △ Less

Submitted 29 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: To appear at EUMAS2023

Sufficient reasons for classifier decisions in the presence of constraints

Authors: Niku Gorji, Sasha Rubin

Abstract: Recent work has unveiled a theory for reasoning about the decisions made by binary classifiers: a classifier describes a Boolean function, and the reasons behind an instance being classified as positive are the prime-implicants of the function that are satisfied by the instance. One drawback of these works is that they do not explicitly treat scenarios where the underlying data is known to be cons… ▽ More Recent work has unveiled a theory for reasoning about the decisions made by binary classifiers: a classifier describes a Boolean function, and the reasons behind an instance being classified as positive are the prime-implicants of the function that are satisfied by the instance. One drawback of these works is that they do not explicitly treat scenarios where the underlying data is known to be constrained, e.g., certain combinations of features may not exist, may not be observable, or may be required to be disregarded. We propose a more general theory, also based on prime-implicants, tailored to taking constraints into account. The main idea is to view classifiers in the presence of constraints as describing partial Boolean functions, i.e., that are undefined on instances that do not satisfy the constraints. We prove that this simple idea results in reasons that are no less (and sometimes more) succinct. That is, not taking constraints into account (e.g., ignored, or taken as negative instances) results in reasons that are subsumed by reasons that do take constraints into account. We illustrate this improved parsimony on synthetic classifiers and classifiers learned from real data. △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Optimal Strategies in Weighted Limit Games

Authors: Aniello Murano, Sasha Rubin, Martin Zimmermann

Abstract: We prove the existence and computability of optimal strategies in weighted limit games, zero-sum infinite-duration games with a Büchi-style winning condition requiring to produce infinitely many play prefixes that satisfy a given regular specification. Quality of plays is measured in the maximal weight of infixes between successive play prefixes that satisfy the specification. We prove the existence and computability of optimal strategies in weighted limit games, zero-sum infinite-duration games with a Büchi-style winning condition requiring to produce infinitely many play prefixes that satisfy a given regular specification. Quality of plays is measured in the maximal weight of infixes between successive play prefixes that satisfy the specification. △ Less

Submitted 22 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Comments: In Proceedings GandALF 2020, arXiv:2009.09360. Full version at arXiv:2008.11562

Journal ref: EPTCS 326, 2020, pp. 114-130

Optimal Strategies in Weighted Limit Games (full version)

Authors: Aniello Murano, Sasha Rubin, Martin Zimmermann

Abstract: We prove the existence and computability of optimal strategies in weighted limit games, zero-sum infinite-duration games with a Büchi-style winning condition requiring to produce infinitely many play prefixes that satisfy a given regular specification. Quality of plays is measured in the maximal weight of infixes between successive play prefixes that satisfy the specification. We prove the existence and computability of optimal strategies in weighted limit games, zero-sum infinite-duration games with a Büchi-style winning condition requiring to produce infinitely many play prefixes that satisfy a given regular specification. Quality of plays is measured in the maximal weight of infixes between successive play prefixes that satisfy the specification. △ Less

Submitted 7 September, 2020; v1 submitted 26 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Equilibria for Games with Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Objectives

Authors: Julian Gutierrez, Aniello Murano, Giuseppe Perelli, Sasha Rubin, Thomas Steeples, Michael Wooldridge

Abstract: The overall aim of our research is to develop techniques to reason about the equilibrium properties of multi-agent systems. We model multi-agent systems as concurrent games, in which each player is a process that is assumed to act independently and strategically in pursuit of personal preferences. In this article, we study these games in the context of finite-memory strategies, and we assume playe… ▽ More The overall aim of our research is to develop techniques to reason about the equilibrium properties of multi-agent systems. We model multi-agent systems as concurrent games, in which each player is a process that is assumed to act independently and strategically in pursuit of personal preferences. In this article, we study these games in the context of finite-memory strategies, and we assume players' preferences are defined by a qualitative and a quantitative objective, which are related by a lexicographic order: a player first prefers to satisfy its qualitative objective (given as a formula of Linear Temporal Logic) and then prefers to minimise costs (given by a mean-payoff function). Our main result is that deciding the existence of a strict epsilon Nash equilibrium in such games is 2ExpTime-complete (and hence decidable), even if players' deviations are implemented as infinite-memory strategies. △ Less

Submitted 12 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Healing Spaces: Feasibility of a Multisensory Experience for Older Adults with Advanced Dementia and their Caregivers

Authors: Gabriela Purri R. Gomes, Sydney Rubin, Leah I. Stein Duker, Donna Benton, Andreas Kratky, Sze Yu A Chen, Maryalice Jordan-Marsh, Marientina Gotsis

Abstract: Healing Spaces proposes a new approach to multisensory interventions that show potential in ameliorating the behavioral and psychological symptoms of advanced dementia in older adults. Using smart technology, the project combines both digital and physical components to transform spaces and create unified, curated sensory experiences that provide meaningful context for interaction, and are easy for… ▽ More Healing Spaces proposes a new approach to multisensory interventions that show potential in ameliorating the behavioral and psychological symptoms of advanced dementia in older adults. Using smart technology, the project combines both digital and physical components to transform spaces and create unified, curated sensory experiences that provide meaningful context for interaction, and are easy for caregivers to deliver. A usability study was conducted for the Healing Spaces app followed by a feasibility evaluation of the full experience in a memory care facility recruiting caregivers, and residents in advanced stages of dementia. The feasibility evaluation successfully illuminated strengths as well as areas for improvement for the Healing Spaces experience in a memory care setting with older adults with advanced dementia. Caregivers and facility managers expressed interest in continuing to use Healing Spaces with the residents of the facility. Lessons learned about the technical and logistical implementation of Healing Spaces are discussed, as well as future directions for study design and potential therapeutic value of the experience. △ Less

Submitted 4 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: PETRA 20: Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. June 2020. Article No 24. Pages 1 to 9

Journal ref: 2020. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA 20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 24, 1 to 9

Strategy Logic with Imperfect Information

Authors: Raphaël Berthon, Bastien Maubert, Aniello Murano, Sasha Rubin, Moshe Vardi

Abstract: We introduce an extension of Strategy Logic for the imperfect-information setting, called SLii, and study its model-checking problem. As this logic naturally captures multi-player games with imperfect information, this problem is undecidable; but we introduce a syntactical class of "hierarchical instances" for which, intuitively, as one goes down the syntactic tree of the formula, strategy quantif… ▽ More We introduce an extension of Strategy Logic for the imperfect-information setting, called SLii, and study its model-checking problem. As this logic naturally captures multi-player games with imperfect information, this problem is undecidable; but we introduce a syntactical class of "hierarchical instances" for which, intuitively, as one goes down the syntactic tree of the formula, strategy quantifications are concerned with finer observations of the model, and we prove that model-checking SLii restricted to hierarchical instances is decidable. To establish this result we go through QCTL, an intermediary, "low-level" logic much more adapted to automata techniques. QCTL is an extension of CTL with second-order quantification over atomic propositions. We extend it to the imperfect information setting by parameterising second-order quantifiers with observations. While the model-checking problem of QCTLii is, in general, undecidable, we identify a syntactic fragment of hierarchical formulas and prove, using an automata-theoretic approach, that it is decidable. We apply our result to solve complex strategic problems in the imperfect-information setting. We first show that the existence of Nash equilibria for deterministic strategies is decidable in games with hierarchical information. We also introduce distributed rational synthesis, a generalisation of rational synthesis to the imperfect-information setting. Because it can easily be expressed in our logic, our main result provides solution to this problem in the case of hierarchical information. △ Less

Submitted 7 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1805.12592

Alternating Tree Automata with Qualitative Semantics

Authors: Raphaël Berthon, Nathanaël Fijalkow, Emmanuel Filiot, Shibashis Guha, Bastien Maubert, Aniello Murano, Laureline Pinault, Sophie Pinchinat, Sasha Rubin, Olivier Serre

Abstract: We study alternating automata with qualitative semantics over infinite binary trees: alternation means that two opposing players construct a decoration of the input tree called a run, and the qualitative semantics says that a run of the automaton is accepting if almost all branches of the run are accepting. In this paper we prove a positive and a negative result for the emptiness problem of altern… ▽ More We study alternating automata with qualitative semantics over infinite binary trees: alternation means that two opposing players construct a decoration of the input tree called a run, and the qualitative semantics says that a run of the automaton is accepting if almost all branches of the run are accepting. In this paper we prove a positive and a negative result for the emptiness problem of alternating automata with qualitative semantics. The positive result is the decidability of the emptiness problem for the case of Büchi acceptance condition. An interesting aspect of our approach is that we do not extend the classical solution for solving the emptiness problem of alternating automata, which first constructs an equivalent non-deterministic automaton. Instead, we directly construct an emptiness game making use of imperfect information. The negative result is the undecidability of the emptiness problem for the case of co-Büchi acceptance condition. This result has two direct consequences: the undecidability of monadic second-order logic extended with the qualitative path-measure quantifier, and the undecidability of the emptiness problem for alternating tree automata with non-zero semantics, a recently introduced probabilistic model of alternating tree automata. △ Less

Submitted 7 December, 2020; v1 submitted 10 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Stochastic Fairness and Language-Theoretic Fairness in Planning on Nondeterministic Domains

Authors: Benjamin Aminof, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Sasha Rubin

Abstract: We address two central notions of fairness in the literature of planning on nondeterministic fully observable domains. The first, which we call stochastic fairness, is classical, and assumes an environment which operates probabilistically using possibly unknown probabilities. The second, which is language-theoretic, assumes that if an action is taken from a given state infinitely often then all it… ▽ More We address two central notions of fairness in the literature of planning on nondeterministic fully observable domains. The first, which we call stochastic fairness, is classical, and assumes an environment which operates probabilistically using possibly unknown probabilities. The second, which is language-theoretic, assumes that if an action is taken from a given state infinitely often then all its possible outcomes should appear infinitely often (we call this state-action fairness). While the two notions coincide for standard reachability goals, they diverge for temporally extended goals. This important difference has been overlooked in the planning literature, and we argue has led to confusion in a number of published algorithms which use reductions that were stated for state-action fairness, for which they are incorrect, while being correct for stochastic fairness. We remedy this and provide an optimal sound and complete algorithm for solving state-action fair planning for LTL/LTLf goals, as well as a correct proof of the lower bound of the goal-complexity (our proof is general enough that it provides new proofs also for the no-fairness and stochastic-fairness cases). Overall, we show that stochastic fairness is better behaved than state-action fairness. △ Less

Submitted 23 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Generalized Planning: Non-Deterministic Abstractions and Trajectory Constraints

Authors: Blai Bonet, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Hector Geffner, Sasha Rubin

Abstract: We study the characterization and computation of general policies for families of problems that share a structure characterized by a common reduction into a single abstract problem. Policies $μ$ that solve the abstract problem P have been shown to solve all problems Q that reduce to P provided that $μ$ terminates in Q. In this work, we shed light on why this termination condition is needed and how… ▽ More We study the characterization and computation of general policies for families of problems that share a structure characterized by a common reduction into a single abstract problem. Policies $μ$ that solve the abstract problem P have been shown to solve all problems Q that reduce to P provided that $μ$ terminates in Q. In this work, we shed light on why this termination condition is needed and how it can be removed. The key observation is that the abstract problem P captures the common structure among the concrete problems Q that is local (Markovian) but misses common structure that is global. We show how such global structure can be captured by means of trajectory constraints that in many cases can be expressed as LTL formulas, thus reducing generalized planning to LTL synthesis. Moreover, for a broad class of problems that involve integer variables that can be increased or decreased, trajectory constraints can be compiled away, reducing generalized planning to fully observable non-deterministic planning. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Comments: Proceedings IJCAI-17

Monadic Second-Order Logic with Path-Measure Quantifier is Undecidable

Authors: Raphaël Berthon, Emmanuel Filiot, Shibashis Guha, Bastien Maubert, Aniello Murano, Laureline Pinault, Jean-François Raskin, Sasha Rubin

Abstract: We prove that the theory of Monadic Second-Order logic (MSO) of the infinite binary tree extended with qualitative path-measure quantifier is undecidable. This quantifier says that the set of infinite paths in the tree that satisfies some formula has Lebesgue-measure one. To do this we prove that the emptiness problem of qualitative universal parity tree automata is undecidable. Qualitative means… ▽ More We prove that the theory of Monadic Second-Order logic (MSO) of the infinite binary tree extended with qualitative path-measure quantifier is undecidable. This quantifier says that the set of infinite paths in the tree that satisfies some formula has Lebesgue-measure one. To do this we prove that the emptiness problem of qualitative universal parity tree automata is undecidable. Qualitative means that a run of a tree automaton is accepting if the set of paths in the run that satisfy the acceptance condition has Lebesgue-measure one. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2019; v1 submitted 14 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Planning and Synthesis Under Assumptions

Authors: Benjamin Aminof, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Aniello Murano, Sasha Rubin

Abstract: In Reasoning about Action and Planning, one synthesizes the agent plan by taking advantage of the assumption on how the environment works (that is, one exploits the environment's effects, its fairness, its trajectory constraints). In this paper we study this form of synthesis in detail. We consider assumptions as constraints on the possible strategies that the environment can have in order to resp… ▽ More In Reasoning about Action and Planning, one synthesizes the agent plan by taking advantage of the assumption on how the environment works (that is, one exploits the environment's effects, its fairness, its trajectory constraints). In this paper we study this form of synthesis in detail. We consider assumptions as constraints on the possible strategies that the environment can have in order to respond to the agent's actions. Such constraints may be given in the form of a planning domain (or action theory), as linear-time formulas over infinite or finite runs, or as a combination of the two. We argue though that not all assumption specifications are meaningful: they need to be consistent, which means that there must exist an environment strategy fulfilling the assumption in spite of the agent actions. For such assumptions, we study how to do synthesis/planning for agent goals, ranging from a classical reachability to goal on traces specified in \LTL and \LTLf/\LDLf, characterizing the problem both mathematically and algorithmically. △ Less

Submitted 21 May, 2019; v1 submitted 18 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Strategy Logic with Imperfect Information

Authors: Raphaël Berthon, Bastien Maubert, Aniello Murano, Sasha Rubin, Moshe Vardi

Abstract: We introduce an extension of Strategy Logic for the imperfect-information setting, called SLii, and study its model-checking problem. As this logic naturally captures multi-player games with imperfect information, the problem turns out to be undecidable. We introduce a syntactical class of "hierarchical instances" for which, intuitively, as one goes down the syntactic tree of the formula, strategy… ▽ More We introduce an extension of Strategy Logic for the imperfect-information setting, called SLii, and study its model-checking problem. As this logic naturally captures multi-player games with imperfect information, the problem turns out to be undecidable. We introduce a syntactical class of "hierarchical instances" for which, intuitively, as one goes down the syntactic tree of the formula, strategy quantifications are concerned with finer observations of the model. We prove that model-checking SLii restricted to hierarchical instances is decidable. This result, because it allows for complex patterns of existential and universal quantification on strategies, greatly generalises previous ones, such as decidability of multi-player games with imperfect information and hierarchical observations, and decidability of distributed synthesis for hierarchical systems. To establish the decidability result, we introduce and study QCTL*ii, an extension of QCTL* (itself an extension of CTL* with second-order quantification over atomic propositions) by parameterising its quantifiers with observations. The simple syntax of QCTL* ii allows us to provide a conceptually neat reduction of SLii to QCTL*ii that separates concerns, allowing one to forget about strategies and players and focus solely on second-order quantification. While the model-checking problem of QCTL*ii is, in general, undecidable, we identify a syntactic fragment of hierarchical formulas and prove, using an automata-theoretic approach, that it is decidable. The decidability result for SLii follows since the reduction maps hierarchical instances of SLii to hierarchical formulas of QCTL*ii . △ Less

Submitted 3 September, 2018; v1 submitted 31 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

Changing Observations in Epistemic Temporal Logic

Authors: Aurèle Barrière, Bastien Maubert, Aniello Murano, Sasha Rubin

Abstract: We study dynamic changes of agents' observational power in logics of knowledge and time. We consider CTL*K, the extension of CTL* with knowledge operators, and enrich it with a new operator that models a change in an agent's way of observing the system. We extend the classic semantics of knowledge for perfect-recall agents to account for changes of observation, and we show that this new operator s… ▽ More We study dynamic changes of agents' observational power in logics of knowledge and time. We consider CTL*K, the extension of CTL* with knowledge operators, and enrich it with a new operator that models a change in an agent's way of observing the system. We extend the classic semantics of knowledge for perfect-recall agents to account for changes of observation, and we show that this new operator strictly increases the expressivity of CTL*K. We reduce the model-checking problem for our logic to that for CTL*K, which is known to be decidable. This provides a solution to the model-checking problem for our logic, but its complexity is not optimal. Indeed we provide a direct decision procedure with better complexity. △ Less

Submitted 3 September, 2018; v1 submitted 17 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

Liveness of Parameterized Timed Networks

Authors: Benjamin Aminof, Sasha Rubin, Francesco Spegni, Florian Zuleger

Abstract: We consider the model checking problem of infinite state systems given in the form of parameterized discrete timed networks with multiple clocks. We show that this problem is decidable with respect to specifications given by B- or S-automata. Such specifications are very expressive (they strictly subsume omega-regular specifications), and easily express complex liveness and safety properties. Our… ▽ More We consider the model checking problem of infinite state systems given in the form of parameterized discrete timed networks with multiple clocks. We show that this problem is decidable with respect to specifications given by B- or S-automata. Such specifications are very expressive (they strictly subsume omega-regular specifications), and easily express complex liveness and safety properties. Our results are obtained by modeling the passage of time using symmetric broadcast, and by solving the model checking problem of parameterized systems of un-timed processes communicating using k-wise rendezvous and symmetric broadcast. Our decidability proof makes use of automata theory, rational linear programming, and geometric reasoning for solving certain reachability questions in vector addition systems; we believe these proof techniques will be useful in solving related problems. △ Less

Submitted 14 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

Extended Graded Modalities in Strategy Logic

Authors: Benjamin Aminof, Vadim Malvone, Aniello Murano, Sasha Rubin

Abstract: Strategy Logic (SL) is a logical formalism for strategic reasoning in multi-agent systems. Its main feature is that it has variables for strategies that are associated to specific agents with a binding operator. We introduce Graded Strategy Logic (GradedSL), an extension of SL by graded quantifiers over tuples of strategy variables, i.e., "there exist at least g different tuples (x_1,...,x_n) of s… ▽ More Strategy Logic (SL) is a logical formalism for strategic reasoning in multi-agent systems. Its main feature is that it has variables for strategies that are associated to specific agents with a binding operator. We introduce Graded Strategy Logic (GradedSL), an extension of SL by graded quantifiers over tuples of strategy variables, i.e., "there exist at least g different tuples (x_1,...,x_n) of strategies" where g is a cardinal from the set N union {aleph_0, aleph_1, 2^aleph_0}. We prove that the model-checking problem of GradedSL is decidable. We then turn to the complexity of fragments of GradedSL. When the g's are restricted to finite cardinals, written GradedNSL, the complexity of model-checking is no harder than for SL, i.e., it is non-elementary in the quantifier rank. We illustrate our formalism by showing how to count the number of different strategy profiles that are Nash equilibria (NE), or subgame-perfect equilibria (SPE). By analyzing the structure of the specific formulas involved, we conclude that the important problems of checking for the existence of a unique NE or SPE can both be solved in 2ExpTime, which is not harder than merely checking for the existence of such equilibria. △ Less

Submitted 12 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Comments: In Proceedings SR 2016, arXiv:1607.02694

ACM Class: I.2.11

Journal ref: EPTCS 218, 2016, pp. 1-14

Satisfiability and Model Checking of CTL* with Graded Path Modalities

Authors: Benjamin Aminof, Aniello Murano, Sasha Rubin

Abstract: Graded path modalities count the number of paths satisfying a property, and generalize the existential (E) and universal (A) path modalities of CTL*. The resulting logic is called GCTL*. We settle the complexity of satisfiability of GCTL*, i.e., 2ExpTime-Complete, and the complexity of the model checking problem for GCTL*, i.e., PSpace-Complete. The lower bounds already hold for CTL*, and so, usin… ▽ More Graded path modalities count the number of paths satisfying a property, and generalize the existential (E) and universal (A) path modalities of CTL*. The resulting logic is called GCTL*. We settle the complexity of satisfiability of GCTL*, i.e., 2ExpTime-Complete, and the complexity of the model checking problem for GCTL*, i.e., PSpace-Complete. The lower bounds already hold for CTL*, and so, using the automata-theoretic approach we supply the upper bounds. The significance of this work is two-fold: GCTL* is more expressive than CTL* at no extra cost in computational complexity, and GCTL* has all the advantages over GCTL (CTL with graded path modalities) that CTL* has over CTL, e.g., the ability to express fairness. △ Less

Submitted 28 October, 2014; originally announced October 2014.

Comments: 13 pages + Appendix

First Cycle Games

Authors: Benjamin Aminof, Sasha Rubin

Abstract: First cycle games (FCG) are played on a finite graph by two players who push a token along the edges until a vertex is repeated, and a simple cycle is formed. The winner is determined by some fixed property Y of the sequence of labels of the edges (or nodes) forming this cycle. These games are traditionally of interest because of their connection with infinite-duration games such as parity and mea… ▽ More First cycle games (FCG) are played on a finite graph by two players who push a token along the edges until a vertex is repeated, and a simple cycle is formed. The winner is determined by some fixed property Y of the sequence of labels of the edges (or nodes) forming this cycle. These games are traditionally of interest because of their connection with infinite-duration games such as parity and mean-payoff games. We study the memory requirements for winning strategies of FCGs and certain associated infinite duration games. We exhibit a simple FCG that is not memoryless determined (this corrects a mistake in \it Memoryless determinacy of parity and mean payoff games: a simple proof by Björklund, Sandberg, Vorobyov (2004) that claims that FCGs for which Y is closed under cyclic permutations are memoryless determined). We show that /Theta(n)! memory (where n is the number of nodes in the graph), which is always sufficient, may be necessary to win some FCGs. On the other hand, we identify easy to check conditions on Y (i.e., Y is closed under cyclic permutations, and both Y and its complement are closed under concatenation) that are sufficient to ensure that the corresponding FCGs and their associated infinite duration games are memoryless determined. We demonstrate that many games considered in the literature, such as mean-payoff, parity, energy, etc., satisfy these conditions. On the complexity side, we show (for efficiently computable Y) that while solving FCGs is in PSPACE, solving some families of FCGs is PSPACE-hard. △ Less

Submitted 3 April, 2014; originally announced April 2014.

Comments: In Proceedings SR 2014, arXiv:1404.0414

ACM Class: F.3

Journal ref: EPTCS 146, 2014, pp. 83-90

Parameterized Model Checking of Token-Passing Systems

Authors: Benjamin Aminof, Swen Jacobs, Ayrat Khalimov, Sasha Rubin

Abstract: We revisit the parameterized model checking problem for token-passing systems and specifications in indexed $\textsf{CTL}^\ast \backslash \textsf{X}$. Emerson and Namjoshi (1995, 2003) have shown that parameterized model checking of indexed $\textsf{CTL}^\ast \backslash \textsf{X}$ in uni-directional token rings can be reduced to checking rings up to some \emph{cutoff} size. Clarke et al. (2004) h… ▽ More We revisit the parameterized model checking problem for token-passing systems and specifications in indexed $\textsf{CTL}^\ast \backslash \textsf{X}$. Emerson and Namjoshi (1995, 2003) have shown that parameterized model checking of indexed $\textsf{CTL}^\ast \backslash \textsf{X}$ in uni-directional token rings can be reduced to checking rings up to some \emph{cutoff} size. Clarke et al. (2004) have shown a similar result for general topologies and indexed $\textsf{LTL} \backslash \textsf{X}$, provided processes cannot choose the directions for sending or receiving the token. We unify and substantially extend these results by systematically exploring fragments of indexed $\textsf{CTL}^\ast \backslash \textsf{X}$ with respect to general topologies. For each fragment we establish whether a cutoff exists, and for some concrete topologies, such as rings, cliques and stars, we infer small cutoffs. Finally, we show that the problem becomes undecidable, and thus no cutoffs exist, if processes are allowed to choose the directions in which they send or from which they receive the token. △ Less

Submitted 25 November, 2013; v1 submitted 18 November, 2013; originally announced November 2013.

Comments: We had to remove an appendix until the proofs and notations there is cleared

Alternating Traps in Muller and Parity Games

Authors: A. Grinshpun, P. Phalitnonkiat, S. Rubin, A. Tarfulea

Abstract: Muller games are played by two players moving a token along a graph; the winner is determined by the set of vertices that occur infinitely often. The central algorithmic problem is to compute the winning regions for the players. Different classes and representations of Muller games lead to problems of varying computational complexity. One such class are parity games; these are of particular signif… ▽ More Muller games are played by two players moving a token along a graph; the winner is determined by the set of vertices that occur infinitely often. The central algorithmic problem is to compute the winning regions for the players. Different classes and representations of Muller games lead to problems of varying computational complexity. One such class are parity games; these are of particular significance in computational complexity, as they remain one of the few combinatorial problems known to be in NP and co-NP but not known to be in P. We show that winning regions for a Muller game can be determined from the alternating structure of its traps. To every Muller game we then associate a natural number that we call its trap-depth; this parameter measures how complicated the trap structure is. We present algorithms for parity games that run in polynomial time for graphs of bounded trap depth, and in general run in time exponential in the trap depth. △ Less

Submitted 23 July, 2013; v1 submitted 13 March, 2013; originally announced March 2013.

Comments: 27 pages, 1 figure

ACM Class: F.2.2

A Myhill-Nerode theorem for automata with advice

Authors: Alex Kruckman, Sasha Rubin, John Sheridan, Ben Zax

Abstract: An automaton with advice is a finite state automaton which has access to an additional fixed infinite string called an advice tape. We refine the Myhill-Nerode theorem to characterize the languages of finite strings that are accepted by automata with advice. We do the same for tree automata with advice. An automaton with advice is a finite state automaton which has access to an additional fixed infinite string called an advice tape. We refine the Myhill-Nerode theorem to characterize the languages of finite strings that are accepted by automata with advice. We do the same for tree automata with advice. △ Less

Submitted 8 October, 2012; originally announced October 2012.

Comments: In Proceedings GandALF 2012, arXiv:1210.2028

Journal ref: EPTCS 96, 2012, pp. 238-246

Cardinality and counting quantifiers on omega-automatic structures

Authors: Lukasz Kaiser, Sasha Rubin, Vince Bárány

Abstract: We investigate structures that can be represented by omega-automata, so called omega-automatic structures, and prove that relations defined over such structures in first-order logic expanded by the first-order quantifiers `there exist at most $\aleph_0$ many', 'there exist finitely many' and 'there exist $k$ modulo $m$ many' are omega-regular. The proof identifies certain algebraic properties of… ▽ More We investigate structures that can be represented by omega-automata, so called omega-automatic structures, and prove that relations defined over such structures in first-order logic expanded by the first-order quantifiers `there exist at most $\aleph_0$ many', 'there exist finitely many' and 'there exist $k$ modulo $m$ many' are omega-regular. The proof identifies certain algebraic properties of omega-semigroups. As a consequence an omega-regular equivalence relation of countable index has an omega-regular set of representatives. This implies Blumensath's conjecture that a countable structure with an $ω$-automatic presentation can be represented using automata on finite words. This also complements a very recent result of Hjörth, Khoussainov, Montalban and Nies showing that there is an omega-automatic structure which has no injective presentation. △ Less

Submitted 20 February, 2008; originally announced February 2008.

Journal ref: Dans Proceedings of the 25th Annual Symposium on the Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science - STACS 2008, Bordeaux : France (2008)

Order-Invariant MSO is Stronger than Counting MSO in the Finite

Authors: Tobias Ganzow, Sasha Rubin

Abstract: We compare the expressiveness of two extensions of monadic second-order logic (MSO) over the class of finite structures. The first, counting monadic second-order logic (CMSO), extends MSO with first-order modulo-counting quantifiers, allowing the expression of queries like ``the number of elements in the structure is even''. The second extension allows the use of an additional binary predicate,… ▽ More We compare the expressiveness of two extensions of monadic second-order logic (MSO) over the class of finite structures. The first, counting monadic second-order logic (CMSO), extends MSO with first-order modulo-counting quantifiers, allowing the expression of queries like ``the number of elements in the structure is even''. The second extension allows the use of an additional binary predicate, not contained in the signature of the queried structure, that must be interpreted as an arbitrary linear order on its universe, obtaining order-invariant MSO. While it is straightforward that every CMSO formula can be translated into an equivalent order-invariant MSO formula, the converse had not yet been settled. Courcelle showed that for restricted classes of structures both order-invariant MSO and CMSO are equally expressive, but conjectured that, in general, order-invariant MSO is stronger than CMSO. We affirm this conjecture by presenting a class of structures that is order-invariantly definable in MSO but not definable in CMSO. △ Less

Submitted 20 March, 2008; v1 submitted 26 June, 2007; originally announced June 2007.

Comments: Revised version contributed to STACS 2008

ACM Class: F.4.1

Journal ref: Dans Proceedings of the 25th Annual Symposium on the Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science - STACS 2008, Bordeaux : France (2008)

Automatic Structures: Richness and Limitations

Authors: Bakhadyr Khoussainov, Andre Nies, Sasha Rubin, Frank Stephan

Abstract: We study the existence of automatic presentations for various algebraic structures. An automatic presentation of a structure is a description of the universe of the structure by a regular set of words, and the interpretation of the relations by synchronised automata. Our first topic concerns characterising classes of automatic structures. We supply a characterisation of the automatic Boolean alg… ▽ More We study the existence of automatic presentations for various algebraic structures. An automatic presentation of a structure is a description of the universe of the structure by a regular set of words, and the interpretation of the relations by synchronised automata. Our first topic concerns characterising classes of automatic structures. We supply a characterisation of the automatic Boolean algebras, and it is proven that the free Abelian group of infinite rank, as well as certain Fraisse limits, do not have automatic presentations. In particular, the countably infinite random graph and the random partial order do not have automatic presentations. Furthermore, no infinite integral domain is automatic. Our second topic is the isomorphism problem. We prove that the complexity of the isomorphism problem for the class of all automatic structures is Σ_1^1-complete. △ Less

Submitted 26 April, 2007; v1 submitted 13 March, 2007; originally announced March 2007.

ACM Class: F.1.1; F.4.3

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 3, Issue 2 (April 26, 2007) lmcs:2219