Showing 1–21 of 21 results for author: Lyon, T S

Realizing the Maximal Analytic Display Fragment of Labeled Sequent Calculi for Tense Logics

Authors: Tim S. Lyon

Abstract: We define and study translations between the maximal class of analytic display calculi for tense logics and labeled sequent calculi, thus solving an open problem about the translatability of proofs between the two formalisms. In particular, we provide PTIME translations that map cut-free display proofs to and from special cut-free labeled proofs, which we dub 'strict' labeled proofs. This identifi… ▽ More We define and study translations between the maximal class of analytic display calculi for tense logics and labeled sequent calculi, thus solving an open problem about the translatability of proofs between the two formalisms. In particular, we provide PTIME translations that map cut-free display proofs to and from special cut-free labeled proofs, which we dub 'strict' labeled proofs. This identifies the space of cut-free display proofs with a polynomially equivalent subspace of labeled proofs, showing how calculi within the two formalisms polynomially simulate one another. We analyze the relative sizes of proofs under this translation, finding that display proofs become polynomially shorter when translated to strict labeled proofs, though with a potential increase in the length of sequents; in the reverse translation, strict labeled proofs may become polynomially larger when translated into display proofs. In order to achieve our results, we formulate labeled sequent calculi in a new way that views rules as 'templates', which are instantiated with substitutions to obtain rule applications; we also provide the first definition of primitive tense structural rules within the labeled sequent formalism. Therefore, our formulation of labeled calculi more closely resembles how display calculi are defined for tense logics, which permits a more fine-grained analysis of rules, substitutions, and translations. This work establishes that every analytic display calculus for a tense logic can be viewed as a labeled sequent calculus, showing conclusively that the labeled formalism subsumes and extends the display formalism in the setting of primitive tense logics. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Decidability of Quasi-Dense Modal Logics

Authors: Piotr Ostropolski-Nalewaja, Tim S. Lyon

Abstract: The decidability of axiomatic extensions of the modal logic K with modal reduction principles, i.e. axioms of the form $\Diamond^{k} p \rightarrow \Diamond^{n} p$, has remained a long-standing open problem. In this paper, we make significant progress toward solving this problem and show that decidability holds for a large subclass of these logics, namely, for 'quasi-dense logics.' Such logics are… ▽ More The decidability of axiomatic extensions of the modal logic K with modal reduction principles, i.e. axioms of the form $\Diamond^{k} p \rightarrow \Diamond^{n} p$, has remained a long-standing open problem. In this paper, we make significant progress toward solving this problem and show that decidability holds for a large subclass of these logics, namely, for 'quasi-dense logics.' Such logics are extensions of K with with modal reduction axioms such that $0 < k < n$ (dubbed 'quasi-density axioms'). To prove decidability, we define novel proof systems for quasi-dense logics consisting of disjunctive existential rules, which are first-order formulae typically used to specify ontologies in the context of database theory. We show that such proof systems can be used to generate proofs and models of modal formulae, and provide an intricate model-theoretic argument showing that such generated models can be encoded as finite objects called 'templates.' By enumerating templates of bound size, we obtain an EXPSPACE decision procedure as a consequence. △ Less

Submitted 5 June, 2024; v1 submitted 16 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: preprint; accepted to LICS 2024

Taking Bi-Intuitionistic Logic First-Order: A Proof-Theoretic Investigation via Polytree Sequents

Authors: Tim S. Lyon, Ian Shillito, Alwen Tiu

Abstract: It is well-known that extending the Hilbert axiomatic system for first-order intuitionistic logic with an exclusion operator, that is dual to implication, collapses the domains in the model into a constant domain. This makes it a very challenging problem to find a sound and complete proof system for first-order bi-intuitionistic logic with non-constant domains, that is also conservative over first… ▽ More It is well-known that extending the Hilbert axiomatic system for first-order intuitionistic logic with an exclusion operator, that is dual to implication, collapses the domains in the model into a constant domain. This makes it a very challenging problem to find a sound and complete proof system for first-order bi-intuitionistic logic with non-constant domains, that is also conservative over first-order intuitionistic logic. We solve this problem by presenting the first sound and complete proof system for first-order bi-intuitionistic logic with increasing domains. We formalize our proof system in a labeled polytree sequent calculus (a notational variant of nested sequents), and prove that it enjoys cut-elimination and is conservative over first-order intuitionistic logic. A key feature of our calculus is an explicit eigenvariable context, which allows us to control precisely the scope of free variables in a polytree structure. Semantically this context can be seen as encoding a notion of Scott's existence predicate for intuitionistic logic. This turns out to be crucial to avoid the collapse of domains and to prove the completeness of our proof system. The explicit consideration of the variable context in a formula sheds light on a previously overlooked dependency between the residuation principle and the existence predicate in the first-order setting, that may help explain the difficulty in obtaining a complete proof system for first-order bi-intuitionistic logic. △ Less

Submitted 5 May, 2024; v1 submitted 24 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Constructive Interpolation and Concept-Based Beth Definability for Description Logics via Sequents

Authors: Tim S. Lyon, Jonas Karge

Abstract: We introduce a constructive method applicable to a large number of description logics (DLs) for establishing the concept-based Beth definability property (CBP) based on sequent systems. Using the highly expressive DL RIQ as a case study, we introduce novel sequent calculi for RIQ-ontologies and show how certain interpolants can be computed from sequent calculus proofs, which permit the extraction… ▽ More We introduce a constructive method applicable to a large number of description logics (DLs) for establishing the concept-based Beth definability property (CBP) based on sequent systems. Using the highly expressive DL RIQ as a case study, we introduce novel sequent calculi for RIQ-ontologies and show how certain interpolants can be computed from sequent calculus proofs, which permit the extraction of explicit definitions of implicitly definable concepts. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first sequent-based approach to computing interpolants and definitions within the context of DLs, as well as the first proof that RIQ enjoys the CBP. Moreover, due to the modularity of our sequent systems, our results hold for any restriction of RIQ, and are applicable to other DLs by suitable modifications. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2024; v1 submitted 24 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: Accepted to IJCAI 2024

Proof Theory and Decision Procedures for Deontic STIT Logics

Authors: Tim S. Lyon, Kees van Berkel

Abstract: This paper addresses the automation of reasoning with deontic STIT logics by means of proof theory. Our methodology consists of leveraging sound and cut-free complete sequent-style calculi to write a proof-search algorithm deciding deontic, multi-agent STIT logics with (un)limited choice. In order to ensure the termination of our proof-search algorithm, we introduce a special loop-checking mechani… ▽ More This paper addresses the automation of reasoning with deontic STIT logics by means of proof theory. Our methodology consists of leveraging sound and cut-free complete sequent-style calculi to write a proof-search algorithm deciding deontic, multi-agent STIT logics with (un)limited choice. In order to ensure the termination of our proof-search algorithm, we introduce a special loop-checking mechanism. Despite the acknowledged potential for deontic reasoning in the context of autonomous vehicles and other areas of AI, this work is the first to provide a syntactic decision procedure for deontic STIT logics. Our proof-search procedures are designed to provide verifiable witnesses/certificates of the (in)validity of formulae, which permit an analysis of the (non)theoremhood of formulae and act as explanations thereof. We utilize our proof-search algorithm to address agent-based normative reasoning tasks such as compliance checking. △ Less

Submitted 5 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Internal and External Calculi: Ordering the Jungle without Being Lost in Translations

Authors: Tim S. Lyon, Agata Ciabattoni, Didier Galmiche, Dominique Larchey-Wendling, Daniel Méry, Nicola Olivetti, Revantha Ramanayake

Abstract: This paper gives a broad account of the various sequent-based proof formalisms in the proof-theoretic literature. We consider formalisms for various modal and tense logics, intuitionistic logic, conditional logics, and bunched logics. After providing an overview of the logics and proof formalisms under consideration, we show how these sequent-based formalisms can be placed in a hierarchy in terms… ▽ More This paper gives a broad account of the various sequent-based proof formalisms in the proof-theoretic literature. We consider formalisms for various modal and tense logics, intuitionistic logic, conditional logics, and bunched logics. After providing an overview of the logics and proof formalisms under consideration, we show how these sequent-based formalisms can be placed in a hierarchy in terms of the underlying data structure of the sequents. We then discuss how this hierarchy can be traversed using translations. Translating proofs up this hierarchy is found to be relatively easy while translating proofs down the hierarchy is substantially more difficult. Finally, we inspect the prevalent distinction in structural proof theory between 'internal calculi' and 'external calculi'. It is observed that these classes resist a rigorous separation, and we critically assess the properties that (calculi from) these classes are purported to possess. △ Less

Submitted 6 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Derivation-Graph-Based Characterizations of Decidable Existential Rule Sets

Authors: Tim S. Lyon, Sebastian Rudolph

Abstract: This paper establishes alternative characterizations of very expressive classes of existential rule sets with decidable query entailment. We consider the notable class of greedy bounded-treewidth sets (gbts) and a new, generalized variant, called weakly gbts (wgbts). Revisiting and building on the notion of derivation graphs, we define (weakly) cycle-free derivation graph sets ((w)cdgs) and employ… ▽ More This paper establishes alternative characterizations of very expressive classes of existential rule sets with decidable query entailment. We consider the notable class of greedy bounded-treewidth sets (gbts) and a new, generalized variant, called weakly gbts (wgbts). Revisiting and building on the notion of derivation graphs, we define (weakly) cycle-free derivation graph sets ((w)cdgs) and employ elaborate proof-theoretic arguments to obtain that gbts and cdgs coincide, as do wgbts and wcdgs. These novel characterizations advance our analytic proof-theoretic understanding of existential rules and will likely be instrumental in practice. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2023; v1 submitted 17 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: accepted to JELIA 2023

Nested Sequents for Quantified Modal Logics

Authors: Tim S. Lyon, Eugenio Orlandelli

Abstract: This paper studies nested sequents for quantified modal logics. In particular, it considers extensions of the propositional modal logics definable by the axioms D, T, B, 4, and 5 with varying, increasing, decreasing, and constant domains. Each calculus is proved to have good structural properties: weakening and contraction are height-preserving admissible and cut is (syntactically) admissible. Eac… ▽ More This paper studies nested sequents for quantified modal logics. In particular, it considers extensions of the propositional modal logics definable by the axioms D, T, B, 4, and 5 with varying, increasing, decreasing, and constant domains. Each calculus is proved to have good structural properties: weakening and contraction are height-preserving admissible and cut is (syntactically) admissible. Each calculus is shown to be equivalent to the corresponding axiomatic system and, thus, to be sound and complete. Finally, it is argued that the calculi are internal -- i.e., each sequent has a formula interpretation -- whenever the existence predicate is expressible in the language. △ Less

Submitted 8 November, 2023; v1 submitted 16 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: accepted to TABLEAUX 2023

Nested Sequents for Intermediate Logics: The Case of Gödel-Dummett Logics

Authors: Tim S. Lyon

Abstract: We present nested sequent systems for propositional Gödel-Dummett logic and its first-order extensions with non-constant and constant domains, built atop nested calculi for intuitionistic logics. To obtain nested systems for these Gödel-Dummett logics, we introduce a new structural rule, called the "linearity rule," which (bottom-up) operates by linearizing branching structure in a given nested se… ▽ More We present nested sequent systems for propositional Gödel-Dummett logic and its first-order extensions with non-constant and constant domains, built atop nested calculi for intuitionistic logics. To obtain nested systems for these Gödel-Dummett logics, we introduce a new structural rule, called the "linearity rule," which (bottom-up) operates by linearizing branching structure in a given nested sequent. In addition, an interesting feature of our calculi is the inclusion of reachability rules, which are special logical rules that operate by propagating data and/or checking if data exists along certain paths within a nested sequent. Such rules require us to generalize our nested sequents to include signatures (i.e. finite collections of variables) in the first-order cases, thus giving rise to a generalization of the usual nested sequent formalism. Our calculi exhibit favorable properties, admitting the height-preserving invertibility of every logical rule and the (height-preserving) admissibility of a large collection of structural and reachability rules. We prove all of our systems sound and cut-free complete, and show that syntactic cut-elimination obtains for the intuitionistic systems. We conclude the paper by discussing possible extensions and modifications, putting forth an array of structural rules that could be used to provide a sizable class of intermediate logics with cut-free nested sequent systems. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2024; v1 submitted 13 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Connecting Proof Theory and Knowledge Representation: Sequent Calculi and the Chase with Existential Rules

Authors: Tim S. Lyon, Piotr Ostropolski-Nalewaja

Abstract: Chase algorithms are indispensable in the domain of knowledge base querying, which enable the extraction of implicit knowledge from a given database via applications of rules from a given ontology. Such algorithms have proved beneficial in identifying logical languages which admit decidable query entailment. Within the discipline of proof theory, sequent calculi have been used to write and design… ▽ More Chase algorithms are indispensable in the domain of knowledge base querying, which enable the extraction of implicit knowledge from a given database via applications of rules from a given ontology. Such algorithms have proved beneficial in identifying logical languages which admit decidable query entailment. Within the discipline of proof theory, sequent calculi have been used to write and design proof-search algorithms to identify decidable classes of logics. In this paper, we show that the chase mechanism in the context of existential rules is in essence the same as proof-search in an extension of Gentzen's sequent calculus for first-order logic. Moreover, we show that proof-search generates universal models of knowledge bases, a feature also exhibited by the chase. Thus, we formally connect a central tool for establishing decidability proof-theoretically with a central decidability tool in the context of knowledge representation. △ Less

Submitted 4 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: Appended version of paper accepted to KR 2023

Standpoint Linear Temporal Logic

Authors: Nicola Gigante, Lucia {Gomez Alvarez}, Tim S. Lyon

Abstract: Many complex scenarios require the coordination of agents possessing unique points of view and distinct semantic commitments. In response, standpoint logic (SL) was introduced in the context of knowledge integration, allowing one to reason with diverse and potentially conflicting viewpoints by means of indexed modalities. Another multi-modal logic of import is linear temporal logic (LTL) - a forma… ▽ More Many complex scenarios require the coordination of agents possessing unique points of view and distinct semantic commitments. In response, standpoint logic (SL) was introduced in the context of knowledge integration, allowing one to reason with diverse and potentially conflicting viewpoints by means of indexed modalities. Another multi-modal logic of import is linear temporal logic (LTL) - a formalism used to express temporal properties of systems and processes, having prominence in formal methods and fields related to artificial intelligence. In this paper, we present standpoint linear temporal logic (SLTL), a new logic that combines the temporal features of LTL with the multi-perspective modelling capacity of SL. We define the logic SLTL, its syntax, and its semantics, establish its decidability and complexity, and provide a terminating tableau calculus to automate SLTL reasoning. Conveniently, this offers a clear path to extend existing LTL reasoners with practical reasoning support for temporal reasoning in multi-perspective settings. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Decidability of Querying First-Order Theories via Countermodels of Finite Width

Authors: Thomas Feller, Tim S. Lyon, Piotr Ostropolski-Nalewaja, Sebastian Rudolph

Abstract: We propose a generic framework for establishing the decidability of a wide range of logical entailment problems (briefly called querying), based on the existence of countermodels that are structurally simple, gauged by certain types of width measures (with treewidth and cliquewidth as popular examples). As an important special case of our framework, we identify logics exhibiting width-finite finit… ▽ More We propose a generic framework for establishing the decidability of a wide range of logical entailment problems (briefly called querying), based on the existence of countermodels that are structurally simple, gauged by certain types of width measures (with treewidth and cliquewidth as popular examples). As an important special case of our framework, we identify logics exhibiting width-finite finitely universal model sets, warranting decidable entailment for a wide range of homomorphism-closed queries, subsuming a diverse set of practically relevant query languages. As a particularly powerful width measure, we propose Blumensath's partitionwidth, which subsumes various other commonly considered width measures and exhibits highly favorable computational and structural properties. Focusing on the formalism of existential rules as a popular showcase, we explain how finite partitionwidth sets of rules subsume other known abstract decidable classes but - leveraging existing notions of stratification - also cover a wide range of new rulesets. We expose natural limitations for fitting the class of finite unification sets into our picture and provide several options for remedy. △ Less

Submitted 12 August, 2023; v1 submitted 13 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Foundations for an Abstract Proof Theory in the Context of Horn Rules

Authors: Tim S. Lyon, Piotr Ostropolski-Nalewaja

Abstract: We introduce a novel, logic-independent framework for the study of sequent-style proof systems, which covers a number of proof-theoretic formalisms and concrete proof systems that appear in the literature. In particular, we introduce a generalized form of sequents, dubbed 'g-sequents,' which are taken to be binary graphs of typical, Gentzen-style sequents. We then define a variety of 'inference ru… ▽ More We introduce a novel, logic-independent framework for the study of sequent-style proof systems, which covers a number of proof-theoretic formalisms and concrete proof systems that appear in the literature. In particular, we introduce a generalized form of sequents, dubbed 'g-sequents,' which are taken to be binary graphs of typical, Gentzen-style sequents. We then define a variety of 'inference rule types' as sets of operations that act over such objects, and define 'abstract (sequent) calculi' as pairs consisting of a set of g-sequents together with a finite set of operations. Our approach permits an analysis of how certain inference rule types interact in a general setting, demonstrating under what conditions rules of a specific type can be permuted with or simulated by others, and being applicable to any sequent-style proof system that fits within our framework. We then leverage our permutation and simulation results to establish generic calculus and proof transformation algorithms, which show that every abstract calculus can be effectively transformed into a lattice of polynomially equivalent abstract calculi. We determine the complexity of computing this lattice and compute the relative sizes of proofs and sequents within distinct calculi of a lattice. We recognize that top elements in lattices correspond to nested sequent systems, while bottom elements correspond to labeled sequent systems, and observe that top and bottom elements coincide with many known (cut-free) nested and labeled sequent systems for logics characterized by Horn properties. △ Less

Submitted 12 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: This paper is currently under review

Nested Sequents for Intuitionistic Grammar Logics via Structural Refinement

Authors: Tim S. Lyon

Abstract: Intuitionistic grammar logics fuse constructive and multi-modal reasoning while permitting the use of converse modalities, serving as a generalization of standard intuitionistic modal logics. In this paper, we provide definitions of these logics as well as establish a suitable proof theory thereof. In particular, we show how to apply the structural refinement methodology to extract cut-free nested… ▽ More Intuitionistic grammar logics fuse constructive and multi-modal reasoning while permitting the use of converse modalities, serving as a generalization of standard intuitionistic modal logics. In this paper, we provide definitions of these logics as well as establish a suitable proof theory thereof. In particular, we show how to apply the structural refinement methodology to extract cut-free nested sequent calculi for intuitionistic grammar logics from their semantics. This method proceeds by first transforming the semantics of these logics into sound and complete labeled sequent systems, which we prove have favorable proof-theoretic properties such as syntactic cut-elimination. We then transform these labeled systems into nested sequent systems via the introduction of propagation rules and the elimination of structural rules. Our derived proof systems are then put to use, whereby we prove the conservativity of intuitionistic grammar logics over their modal counterparts, establish the general undecidability of these logics, and recognize a decidable subclass, referred to as "simple" intuitionistic grammar logics. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: This paper is currently under review. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2107.01998

Nested Sequents for First-Order Modal Logics via Reachability Rules

Authors: Tim S. Lyon

Abstract: We introduce the first cut-free nested sequent systems for first-order modal logics that admit increasing, decreasing, constant, and empty domains along with so-called general path conditions and seriality. We obtain such systems by means of two devices: 'reachability rules' and 'structural refinement'. Regarding the former device, we introduce reachability rules as special logical rules parameter… ▽ More We introduce the first cut-free nested sequent systems for first-order modal logics that admit increasing, decreasing, constant, and empty domains along with so-called general path conditions and seriality. We obtain such systems by means of two devices: 'reachability rules' and 'structural refinement'. Regarding the former device, we introduce reachability rules as special logical rules parameterized with formal grammars (viz. types of semi-Thue systems) that operate by propagating formulae and/or checking if data exists along certain paths within a nested sequent, where paths are encoded as strings generated by a parameterizing grammar. Regarding the latter device, structural refinement is a relatively new methodology used to extract nested sequent systems from labeled systems (which are ultimately obtained from a semantics) by means of eliminating structural/relational rules, introducing reachability rules, and then carrying out a notational translation. We therefore demonstrate how this method can be extended to the setting of first-order modal logics, and expose how reachability rules naturally arise from applying this method. △ Less

Submitted 8 November, 2023; v1 submitted 3 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Finite-Cliquewidth Sets of Existential Rules: Toward a General Criterion for Decidable yet Highly Expressive Querying

Authors: Thomas Feller, Tim S. Lyon, Piotr Ostropolski-Nalewaja, Sebastian Rudolph

Abstract: In our pursuit of generic criteria for decidable ontology-based querying, we introduce 'finite-cliquewidth sets' (FCS) of existential rules, a model-theoretically defined class of rule sets, inspired by the cliquewidth measure from graph theory. By a generic argument, we show that FCS ensures decidability of entailment for a sizable class of queries (dubbed 'DaMSOQs') subsuming conjunctive queries… ▽ More In our pursuit of generic criteria for decidable ontology-based querying, we introduce 'finite-cliquewidth sets' (FCS) of existential rules, a model-theoretically defined class of rule sets, inspired by the cliquewidth measure from graph theory. By a generic argument, we show that FCS ensures decidability of entailment for a sizable class of queries (dubbed 'DaMSOQs') subsuming conjunctive queries (CQs). The FCS class properly generalizes the class of finite-expansion sets (FES), and for signatures of arity at most 2, the class of bounded-treewidth sets (BTS). For higher arities, BTS is only indirectly subsumed by FCS by means of reification. Despite the generality of FCS, we provide a rule set with decidable CQ entailment (by virtue of first-order-rewritability) that falls outside FCS, thus demonstrating the incomparability of FCS and the class of finite-unification sets (FUS). In spite of this, we show that if we restrict ourselves to single-headed rule sets over signatures of arity at most 2, then FCS subsumes FUS. △ Less

Submitted 6 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: Accepted to the 26th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT) 2023

A logical analysis of instrumentality judgments: means-end relations in the context of experience and expectations

Authors: Kees van Berkel, Tim S. Lyon, Matteo Pascucci

Abstract: This article proposes the use of temporal logic for an analysis of instrumentality inspired by the work of G.H. von Wright. The first part of the article contains the philosophical foundations. We discuss von Wright's general theory of agency and his account of instrumentality. Moreover, we propose several refinements to this framework via rigorous definitions of the core notions involved. In the… ▽ More This article proposes the use of temporal logic for an analysis of instrumentality inspired by the work of G.H. von Wright. The first part of the article contains the philosophical foundations. We discuss von Wright's general theory of agency and his account of instrumentality. Moreover, we propose several refinements to this framework via rigorous definitions of the core notions involved. In the second part, we develop a logical system called Temporal Logic of Action and Expectations (TLAE). The logic is inspired by a fragment of propositional dynamic logic based on indeterministic time. The system is proven to be weakly complete relative to its given semantics. We then employ TLAE to formalise and analyse the instrumentality relations defined in the first part of the paper. Last, we point out philosophical implications and possible extensions of our work. △ Less

Submitted 23 February, 2023; v1 submitted 6 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Automating Reasoning with Standpoint Logic via Nested Sequents

Authors: Tim S. Lyon, Lucía Gómez Álvarez

Abstract: Standpoint logic is a recently proposed formalism in the context of knowledge integration, which advocates a multi-perspective approach permitting reasoning with a selection of diverse and possibly conflicting standpoints rather than forcing their unification. In this paper, we introduce nested sequent calculi for propositional standpoint logics--proof systems that manipulate trees whose nodes are… ▽ More Standpoint logic is a recently proposed formalism in the context of knowledge integration, which advocates a multi-perspective approach permitting reasoning with a selection of diverse and possibly conflicting standpoints rather than forcing their unification. In this paper, we introduce nested sequent calculi for propositional standpoint logics--proof systems that manipulate trees whose nodes are multisets of formulae--and show how to automate standpoint reasoning by means of non-deterministic proof-search algorithms. To obtain worst-case complexity-optimal proof-search, we introduce a novel technique in the context of nested sequents, referred to as "coloring," which consists of taking a formula as input, guessing a certain coloring of its subformulae, and then running proof-search in a nested sequent calculus on the colored input. Our technique lets us decide the validity of standpoint formulae in CoNP since proof-search only produces a partial proof relative to each permitted coloring of the input. We show how all partial proofs can be fused together to construct a complete proof when the input is valid, and how certain partial proofs can be transformed into a counter-model when the input is invalid. These "certificates" (i.e. proofs and counter-models) serve as explanations of the (in)validity of the input. △ Less

Submitted 5 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: Accepted to KR 2022: https://kr2022.cs.tu-dortmund.de/

A Framework for Intuitionistic Grammar Logics

Authors: Tim S. Lyon

Abstract: We generalize intuitionistic tense logics to the multi-modal case by placing grammar logics on an intuitionistic footing. We provide axiomatizations for a class of base intuitionistic grammar logics as well as provide axiomatizations for extensions with combinations of seriality axioms and what we call "intuitionistic path axioms". We show that each axiomatization is sound and complete with comple… ▽ More We generalize intuitionistic tense logics to the multi-modal case by placing grammar logics on an intuitionistic footing. We provide axiomatizations for a class of base intuitionistic grammar logics as well as provide axiomatizations for extensions with combinations of seriality axioms and what we call "intuitionistic path axioms". We show that each axiomatization is sound and complete with completeness being shown via a typical canonical model construction. △ Less

Submitted 2 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: Preprint of paper published at the 4th International Conference on Logic and Argumentation (CLAR 2021)

Nested Sequents for Intuitionistic Modal Logics via Structural Refinement

Authors: Tim S. Lyon

Abstract: We employ a recently developed methodology -- called "structural refinement" -- to extract nested sequent systems for a sizable class of intuitionistic modal logics from their respective labelled sequent systems. This method can be seen as a means by which labelled sequent systems can be transformed into nested sequent systems through the introduction of propagation rules and the elimination of st… ▽ More We employ a recently developed methodology -- called "structural refinement" -- to extract nested sequent systems for a sizable class of intuitionistic modal logics from their respective labelled sequent systems. This method can be seen as a means by which labelled sequent systems can be transformed into nested sequent systems through the introduction of propagation rules and the elimination of structural rules, followed by a notational translation. The nested systems we obtain incorporate propagation rules that are parameterized with formal grammars, and which encode certain frame conditions expressible as first-order Horn formulae that correspond to a subclass of the Scott-Lemmon axioms. We show that our nested systems are sound, cut-free complete, and admit hp-admissibility of typical structural rules. △ Less

Submitted 5 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Display to Labeled Proofs and Back Again for Tense Logics

Authors: Agata Ciabattoni, Tim S. Lyon, Revantha Ramanayake, Alwen Tiu

Abstract: We introduce translations between display calculus proofs and labeled calculus proofs in the context of tense logics. First, we show that every derivation in the display calculus for the minimal tense logic Kt extended with general path axioms can be effectively transformed into a derivation in the corresponding labeled calculus. Concerning the converse translation, we show that for Kt extended wi… ▽ More We introduce translations between display calculus proofs and labeled calculus proofs in the context of tense logics. First, we show that every derivation in the display calculus for the minimal tense logic Kt extended with general path axioms can be effectively transformed into a derivation in the corresponding labeled calculus. Concerning the converse translation, we show that for Kt extended with path axioms, every derivation in the corresponding labeled calculus can be put into a special form that is translatable to a derivation in the associated display calculus. A key insight in this converse translation is a canonical representation of display sequents as labeled polytrees. Labeled polytrees, which represent equivalence classes of display sequents modulo display postulates, also shed light on related correspondence results for tense logics. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2021; v1 submitted 6 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.