-
Characterisation of Lawvere-Tierney Topologies on Simplicial Sets, Bicolored Graphs, and Fuzzy Sets
Authors:
Aloïs Rosset,
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Jörg Endrullis
Abstract:
Simplicial sets generalize many categories of graphs. In this paper, we give a complete characterization of the Lawvere-Tierney topologies on (semi-)simplicial sets, on bicolored graphs, and on fuzzy sets. We apply our results to establish that 'partially simple' simplicial sets and 'partially simple' graphs form quasitoposes.
Simplicial sets generalize many categories of graphs. In this paper, we give a complete characterization of the Lawvere-Tierney topologies on (semi-)simplicial sets, on bicolored graphs, and on fuzzy sets. We apply our results to establish that 'partially simple' simplicial sets and 'partially simple' graphs form quasitoposes.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Correspondence between Composite Theories and Distributive Laws
Authors:
Aloïs Rosset,
Maaike Zwart,
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Jörg Endrullis
Abstract:
Composite theories are the algebraic equivalent of distributive laws. In this paper, we delve into the details of this correspondence and concretely show how to construct a composite theory from a distributive law and vice versa. Using term rewriting methods, we also describe when a minimal set of equations axiomatises the composite theory.
Composite theories are the algebraic equivalent of distributive laws. In this paper, we delve into the details of this correspondence and concretely show how to construct a composite theory from a distributive law and vice versa. Using term rewriting methods, we also describe when a minimal set of equations axiomatises the composite theory.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Algebraic Presentation of Semifree Monads
Authors:
Aloïs Rosset,
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Jörg Endrullis
Abstract:
Monads and their composition via distributive laws have many applications in program semantics and functional programming. For many interesting monads, distributive laws fail to exist, and this has motivated investigations into weaker notions. In this line of research, Petrişan and Sarkis recently introduced a construction called the semifree monad in order to study semialgebras for a monad and we…
▽ More
Monads and their composition via distributive laws have many applications in program semantics and functional programming. For many interesting monads, distributive laws fail to exist, and this has motivated investigations into weaker notions. In this line of research, Petrişan and Sarkis recently introduced a construction called the semifree monad in order to study semialgebras for a monad and weak distributive laws. In this paper, we prove that an algebraic presentation of the semifree monad M^s on a monad M can be obtained uniformly from an algebraic presentation of M. This result was conjectured by Petrişan and Sarkis. We also show that semifree monads are ideal monads, that the semifree construction is not a monad transformer, and that the semifree construction is a comonad on the category of monads.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Logic-Induced Bisimulations
Authors:
Jim de Groot,
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Alexander Kurz
Abstract:
We define a new logic-induced notion of bisimulation (called $ρ$-bisimulation) for coalgebraic modal logics given by a logical connection, and investigate its properties. We show that it is structural in the sense that it is defined only in terms of the coalgebra structure and the one-step modal semantics and, moreover, can be characterised by a form of relation lifting. Furthermore we compare…
▽ More
We define a new logic-induced notion of bisimulation (called $ρ$-bisimulation) for coalgebraic modal logics given by a logical connection, and investigate its properties. We show that it is structural in the sense that it is defined only in terms of the coalgebra structure and the one-step modal semantics and, moreover, can be characterised by a form of relation lifting. Furthermore we compare $ρ$-bisimulations to several well-known equivalence notions, and we prove that the collection of bisimulations between two models often forms a complete lattice. The main technical result is a Hennessy-Milner type theorem which states that, under certain conditions, logical equivalence implies $ρ$-bisimilarity. In particular, the latter does \emph{not} rely on a duality between functors $\mathsf{T}$ (the type of the coalgebras) and $\mathsf{L}$ (which gives the logic), nor on properties of the logical connection $ρ$.
△ Less
Submitted 20 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Minimisation in Logical Form
Authors:
Nick Bezhanishvili,
Marcello Bonsangue,
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Dexter Kozen,
Clemens Kupke,
Prakash Panangaden,
Alexandra Silva
Abstract:
Stone-type dualities provide a powerful mathematical framework for studying properties of logical systems. They have recently been fruitfully explored in understanding minimisation of various types of automata. In Bezhanishvili et al. (2012), a dual equivalence between a category of coalgebras and a category of algebras was used to explain minimisation. The algebraic semantics is dual to a coalgeb…
▽ More
Stone-type dualities provide a powerful mathematical framework for studying properties of logical systems. They have recently been fruitfully explored in understanding minimisation of various types of automata. In Bezhanishvili et al. (2012), a dual equivalence between a category of coalgebras and a category of algebras was used to explain minimisation. The algebraic semantics is dual to a coalgebraic semantics in which logical equivalence coincides with trace equivalence. It follows that maximal quotients of coalgebras correspond to minimal subobjects of algebras. Examples include partially observable deterministic finite automata, linear weighted automata viewed as coalgebras over finite-dimensional vector spaces, and belief automata, which are coalgebras on compact Hausdorff spaces. In Bonchi et al. (2014), Brzozowski's double-reversal minimisation algorithm for deterministic finite automata was described categorically and its correctness explained via the duality between reachability and observability. This work includes generalisations of Brzozowski's algorithm to Moore and weighted automata over commutative semirings.
In this paper we propose a general categorical framework within which such minimisation algorithms can be understood. The goal is to provide a unifying perspective based on duality. Our framework consists of a stack of three interconnected adjunctions: a base dual adjunction that can be lifted to a dual adjunction between coalgebras and algebras and also to a dual adjunction between automata. The approach provides an abstract understanding of reachability and observability. We illustrate the general framework on range of concrete examples, including deterministic Kripke frames, weighted automata, topological automata (belief automata), and alternating automata.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Arrow's Theorem Through a Fixpoint Argument
Authors:
Frank M. V. Feys,
Helle Hvid Hansen
Abstract:
We present a proof of Arrow's theorem from social choice theory that uses a fixpoint argument. Specifically, we use Banach's result on the existence of a fixpoint of a contractive map defined on a complete metric space. Conceptually, our approach shows that dictatorships can be seen as fixpoints of a certain process.
We present a proof of Arrow's theorem from social choice theory that uses a fixpoint argument. Specifically, we use Banach's result on the existence of a fixpoint of a contractive map defined on a complete metric space. Conceptually, our approach shows that dictatorships can be seen as fixpoints of a certain process.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Completeness for Game Logic
Authors:
Sebastian Enqvist,
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Clemens Kupke,
Johannes Marti,
Yde Venema
Abstract:
Game logic was introduced by Rohit Parikh in the 1980s as a generalisation of propositional dynamic logic (PDL) for reasoning about outcomes that players can force in determined 2-player games. Semantically, the generalisation from programs to games is mirrored by moving from Kripke models to monotone neighbourhood models. Parikh proposed a natural PDL-style Hilbert system which was easily proved…
▽ More
Game logic was introduced by Rohit Parikh in the 1980s as a generalisation of propositional dynamic logic (PDL) for reasoning about outcomes that players can force in determined 2-player games. Semantically, the generalisation from programs to games is mirrored by moving from Kripke models to monotone neighbourhood models. Parikh proposed a natural PDL-style Hilbert system which was easily proved to be sound, but its completeness has thus far remained an open problem.
In this paper, we introduce a cut-free sequent calculus for game logic, and two cut-free sequent calculi that manipulate annotated formulas, one for game logic and one for the monotone mu-calculus, the variant of the polymodal mu-calculus where the semantics is given by monotone neighbourhood models instead of Kripke structures. We show these systems are sound and complete, and that completeness of Parikh's axiomatization follows. Our approach builds on recent ideas and results by Afshari & Leigh (LICS 2017) in that we obtain completeness via a sequence of proof transformations between the systems. A crucial ingredient is a validity-preserving translation from game logic to the monotone mu-calculus.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2019; v1 submitted 16 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Parity Games and Automata for Game Logic (Extended Version)
Authors:
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Clemens Kupke,
Johannes Marti,
Yde Venema
Abstract:
Parikh's game logic is a PDL-like fixpoint logic interpreted on monotone neighbourhood frames that represent the strategic power of players in determined two-player games. Game logic translates into a fragment of the monotone $μ$-calculus, which in turn is expressively equivalent to monotone modal automata. Parity games and automata are important tools for dealing with the combinatorial complexity…
▽ More
Parikh's game logic is a PDL-like fixpoint logic interpreted on monotone neighbourhood frames that represent the strategic power of players in determined two-player games. Game logic translates into a fragment of the monotone $μ$-calculus, which in turn is expressively equivalent to monotone modal automata. Parity games and automata are important tools for dealing with the combinatorial complexity of nested fixpoints in modal fixpoint logics, such as the modal $μ$-calculus. In this paper, we (1) discuss the semantics a of game logic over neighbourhood structures in terms of parity games, and (2) use these games to obtain an automata-theoretic characterisation of the fragment of the monotone $μ$-calculus that corresponds to game logic. Our proof makes extensive use of structures that we call syntax graphs that combine the ease-of-use of syntax trees of formulas with the flexibility and succinctness of automata. They are essentially a graph-based view of the alternating tree automata that were introduced by Wilke in the study of modal $μ$-calculus.
△ Less
Submitted 3 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Coinductive Foundations of Infinitary Rewriting and Infinitary Equational Logic
Authors:
Jörg Endrullis,
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Dimitri Hendriks,
Andrew Polonsky,
Alexandra Silva
Abstract:
We present a coinductive framework for defining and reasoning about the infinitary analogues of equational logic and term rewriting in a uniform, coinductive way. The setup captures rewrite sequences of arbitrary ordinal length, but it has neither the need for ordinals nor for metric convergence. This makes the framework especially suitable for formalizations in theorem provers.
We present a coinductive framework for defining and reasoning about the infinitary analogues of equational logic and term rewriting in a uniform, coinductive way. The setup captures rewrite sequences of arbitrary ordinal length, but it has neither the need for ordinals nor for metric convergence. This makes the framework especially suitable for formalizations in theorem provers.
△ Less
Submitted 9 January, 2018; v1 submitted 31 May, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
Stream Differential Equations: Specification Formats and Solution Methods
Authors:
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Clemens Kupke,
Jan Rutten
Abstract:
Streams, or infinite sequences, are infinite objects of a very simple type, yet they have a rich theory partly due to their ubiquity in mathematics and computer science. Stream differential equations are a coinductive method for specifying streams and stream operations, and their theory has been developed in many papers over the past two decades. In this paper we present a survey of the many resul…
▽ More
Streams, or infinite sequences, are infinite objects of a very simple type, yet they have a rich theory partly due to their ubiquity in mathematics and computer science. Stream differential equations are a coinductive method for specifying streams and stream operations, and their theory has been developed in many papers over the past two decades. In this paper we present a survey of the many results in this area. Our focus is on the classification of different formats of stream differential equations, their solution methods, and the classes of streams they can define. Moreover, we describe in detail the connection between the so-called syntactic solution method and abstract GSOS.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2017; v1 submitted 27 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
Weak Completeness of Coalgebraic Dynamic Logics
Authors:
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Clemens Kupke
Abstract:
We present a coalgebraic generalisation of Fischer and Ladner's Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL) and Parikh's Game Logic (GL). In earlier work, we proved a generic strong completeness result for coalgebraic dynamic logics without iteration. The coalgebraic semantics of such programs is given by a monad T, and modalities are interpreted via a predicate lifting Î whose transpose is a monad morphi…
▽ More
We present a coalgebraic generalisation of Fischer and Ladner's Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL) and Parikh's Game Logic (GL). In earlier work, we proved a generic strong completeness result for coalgebraic dynamic logics without iteration. The coalgebraic semantics of such programs is given by a monad T, and modalities are interpreted via a predicate lifting Î whose transpose is a monad morphism from T to the neighbourhood monad. In this paper, we show that if the monad T carries a complete semilattice structure, then we can define an iteration construct, and suitable notions of diamond-likeness and box-likeness of predicate-liftings which allows for the definition of an axiomatisation parametric in T, Î and a chosen set of pointwise program operations. As our main result, we show that if the pointwise operations are "negation-free" and Kleisli composition left-distributes over the induced join on Kleisli arrows, then this axiomatisation is weakly complete with respect to the class of standard models. As special instances, we recover the weak completeness of PDL and of dual-free Game Logic. As a modest new result we obtain completeness for dual-free GL extended with intersection (demonic choice) of games.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
-
A Coinductive Framework for Infinitary Rewriting and Equational Reasoning (Extended Version)
Authors:
Jörg Endrullis,
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Dimitri Hendriks,
Andrew Polonsky,
Alexandra Silva
Abstract:
We present a coinductive framework for defining infinitary analogues of equational reasoning and rewriting in a uniform way. We define the relation =^infty, notion of infinitary equational reasoning, and ->^infty, the standard notion of infinitary rewriting as follows:
=^infty := nu R. ( <-_root + ->_root + lift(R) )^*
->^infty := mu R. nu S. ( ->_root + lift(R) )^* ; lift(S)
where
lift(R)…
▽ More
We present a coinductive framework for defining infinitary analogues of equational reasoning and rewriting in a uniform way. We define the relation =^infty, notion of infinitary equational reasoning, and ->^infty, the standard notion of infinitary rewriting as follows:
=^infty := nu R. ( <-_root + ->_root + lift(R) )^*
->^infty := mu R. nu S. ( ->_root + lift(R) )^* ; lift(S)
where
lift(R) := { (f(s_1,...,s_n), f(t_1,...,t_n)) | s_1 R t_1,...,s_n R t_n } + id ,
and where mu is the least fixed point operator and nu is the greatest fixed point operator.
The setup captures rewrite sequences of arbitrary ordinal length, but it has neither the need for ordinals nor for metric convergence. This makes the framework especially suitable for formalizations in theorem provers.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
-
Presenting Distributive Laws
Authors:
Marcello M. Bonsangue,
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Alexander Kurz,
Jurriaan Rot
Abstract:
Distributive laws of a monad T over a functor F are categorical tools for specifying algebra-coalgebra interaction. They proved to be important for solving systems of corecursive equations, for the specification of well-behaved structural operational semantics and, more recently, also for enhancements of the bisimulation proof method. If T is a free monad, then such distributive laws correspond t…
▽ More
Distributive laws of a monad T over a functor F are categorical tools for specifying algebra-coalgebra interaction. They proved to be important for solving systems of corecursive equations, for the specification of well-behaved structural operational semantics and, more recently, also for enhancements of the bisimulation proof method. If T is a free monad, then such distributive laws correspond to simple natural transformations. However, when T is not free it can be rather difficult to prove the defining axioms of a distributive law. In this paper we describe how to obtain a distributive law for a monad with an equational presentation from a distributive law for the underlying free monad. We apply this result to show the equivalence between two different representations of context-free languages.
△ Less
Submitted 5 August, 2015; v1 submitted 9 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
A Coinductive Treatment of Infinitary Rewriting
Authors:
Joerg Endrullis,
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Dimitri Hendriks,
Andrew Polonsky,
Alexandra Silva
Abstract:
We introduce a coinductive definition of infinitary term rewriting. The setup is surprisingly simple, and has in contrast to the usual definitions of infinitary rewriting, neither need for ordinals nor for metric convergence. While the idea of a coinductive treatment of infinitary rewriting is not new, all previous approaches were limited to reductions of length at most omega. The approach present…
▽ More
We introduce a coinductive definition of infinitary term rewriting. The setup is surprisingly simple, and has in contrast to the usual definitions of infinitary rewriting, neither need for ordinals nor for metric convergence. While the idea of a coinductive treatment of infinitary rewriting is not new, all previous approaches were limited to reductions of length at most omega. The approach presented in this paper is the first to capture the full infinitary term rewriting with reductions of arbitrary ordinal length. Apart from an elegant reformulation of known concepts, our approach gives rise, in a very natural way, to a novel notion of infinitary equational reasoning.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2014; v1 submitted 26 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
-
Neighbourhood Structures: Bisimilarity and Basic Model Theory
Authors:
Helle Hvid Hansen,
Clemens Kupke,
Eric Pacuit
Abstract:
Neighbourhood structures are the standard semantic tool used to reason about non-normal modal logics. The logic of all neighbourhood models is called classical modal logic. In coalgebraic terms, a neighbourhood frame is a coalgebra for the contravariant powerset functor composed with itself, denoted by 2^2. We use this coalgebraic modelling to derive notions of equivalence between neighbourhood…
▽ More
Neighbourhood structures are the standard semantic tool used to reason about non-normal modal logics. The logic of all neighbourhood models is called classical modal logic. In coalgebraic terms, a neighbourhood frame is a coalgebra for the contravariant powerset functor composed with itself, denoted by 2^2. We use this coalgebraic modelling to derive notions of equivalence between neighbourhood structures. 2^2-bisimilarity and behavioural equivalence are well known coalgebraic concepts, and they are distinct, since 2^2 does not preserve weak pullbacks. We introduce a third, intermediate notion whose witnessing relations we call precocongruences (based on pushouts). We give back-and-forth style characterisations for 2^2-bisimulations and precocongruences, we show that on a single coalgebra, precocongruences capture behavioural equivalence, and that between neighbourhood structures, precocongruences are a better approximation of behavioural equivalence than 2^2-bisimulations. We also introduce a notion of modal saturation for neighbourhood models, and investigate its relationship with definability and image-finiteness. We prove a Hennessy-Milner theorem for modally saturated and for image-finite neighbourhood models. Our main results are an analogue of Van Benthem's characterisation theorem and a model-theoretic proof of Craig interpolation for classical modal logic.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2009; v1 submitted 28 January, 2009;
originally announced January 2009.
