-
On the Number of Quantifiers Needed to Define Boolean Functions
Authors:
Marco Carmosino,
Ronald Fagin,
Neil Immerman,
Phokion Kolaitis,
Jonathan Lenchner,
Rik Sengupta
Abstract:
The number of quantifiers needed to express first-order (FO) properties is captured by two-player combinatorial games called multi-structural games. We analyze these games on binary strings with an ordering relation, using a technique we call parallel play, which significantly reduces the number of quantifiers needed in many cases. Ordered structures such as strings have historically been notoriou…
▽ More
The number of quantifiers needed to express first-order (FO) properties is captured by two-player combinatorial games called multi-structural games. We analyze these games on binary strings with an ordering relation, using a technique we call parallel play, which significantly reduces the number of quantifiers needed in many cases. Ordered structures such as strings have historically been notoriously difficult to analyze in the context of these and similar games. Nevertheless, in this paper, we provide essentially tight upper bounds on the number of quantifiers needed to characterize different-sized subsets of strings. The results immediately give bounds on the number of quantifiers necessary to define several different classes of Boolean functions. One of our results is analogous to Lupanov's upper bounds on circuit size and formula size in propositional logic: we show that every Boolean function on $n$-bit inputs can be defined by a FO sentence having $(1 + \varepsilon)n\log(n) + O(1)$ quantifiers, and that this is essentially tight. We reduce this number to $(1 + \varepsilon)\log(n) + O(1)$ when the Boolean function in question is sparse.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Parallel Play Saves Quantifiers
Authors:
Marco Carmosino,
Ronald Fagin,
Neil Immerman,
Phokion Kolaitis,
Jonathan Lenchner,
Rik Sengupta,
Ryan Williams
Abstract:
The number of quantifiers needed to express first-order properties is captured by two-player combinatorial games called multi-structural (MS) games. We play these games on linear orders and strings, and introduce a technique we call "parallel play", that dramatically reduces the number of quantifiers needed in many cases. Linear orders and strings are the most basic representatives of ordered stru…
▽ More
The number of quantifiers needed to express first-order properties is captured by two-player combinatorial games called multi-structural (MS) games. We play these games on linear orders and strings, and introduce a technique we call "parallel play", that dramatically reduces the number of quantifiers needed in many cases. Linear orders and strings are the most basic representatives of ordered structures -- a class of structures that has historically been notoriously difficult to analyze. Yet, in this paper, we provide upper bounds on the number of quantifiers needed to characterize different-sized subsets of these structures, and prove that they are tight up to constant factors, including, in some cases, up to a factor of $1+\varepsilon$, for arbitrarily small $\varepsilon$.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2024; v1 submitted 15 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
A Framework for Combining Entity Resolution and Query Answering in Knowledge Bases
Authors:
Ronald Fagin,
Phokion G. Kolaitis,
Domenico Lembo,
Lucian Popa,
Federico Scafoglieri
Abstract:
We propose a new framework for combining entity resolution and query answering in knowledge bases (KBs) with tuple-generating dependencies (tgds) and equality-generating dependencies (egds) as rules. We define the semantics of the KB in terms of special instances that involve equivalence classes of entities and sets of values. Intuitively, the former collect all entities denoting the same real-wor…
▽ More
We propose a new framework for combining entity resolution and query answering in knowledge bases (KBs) with tuple-generating dependencies (tgds) and equality-generating dependencies (egds) as rules. We define the semantics of the KB in terms of special instances that involve equivalence classes of entities and sets of values. Intuitively, the former collect all entities denoting the same real-world object, while the latter collect all alternative values for an attribute. This approach allows us to both resolve entities and bypass possible inconsistencies in the data. We then design a chase procedure that is tailored to this new framework and has the feature that it never fails; moreover, when the chase procedure terminates, it produces a universal solution, which in turn can be used to obtain the certain answers to conjunctive queries. We finally discuss challenges arising when the chase does not terminate.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Multi-Structural Games and Beyond
Authors:
Marco Carmosino,
Ronald Fagin,
Neil Immerman,
Phokion Kolaitis,
Jonathan Lenchner,
Rik Sengupta
Abstract:
Multi-structural (MS) games are combinatorial games that capture the number of quantifiers of first-order sentences. On the face of their definition, MS games differ from Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse (EF) games in two ways: first, MS games are played on two sets of structures, while EF games are played on a pair of structures; second, in MS games, Duplicator can make any number of copies of structures. In…
▽ More
Multi-structural (MS) games are combinatorial games that capture the number of quantifiers of first-order sentences. On the face of their definition, MS games differ from Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse (EF) games in two ways: first, MS games are played on two sets of structures, while EF games are played on a pair of structures; second, in MS games, Duplicator can make any number of copies of structures. In the first part of this paper, we perform a finer analysis of MS games and develop a closer comparison of MS games with EF games. In particular, we point out that the use of sets of structures is of the essence and that when MS games are played on pairs of structures, they capture Boolean combinations of first-order sentences with a fixed number of quantifiers. After this, we focus on another important difference between MS games and EF games, namely, the necessity for Spoiler to play on top of a previous move in order to win some MS games. Via an analysis of the types realized during MS games, we delineate the expressive power of the variant of MS games in which Spoiler never plays on top of a previous move. In the second part we focus on simultaneously capturing number of quantifiers and number of variables in first-order logic. We show that natural variants of the MS game do *not* achieve this. We then introduce a new game, the quantifier-variable tree game, and show that it simultaneously captures the number of quantifiers and number of variables. We conclude by generalizing this game to a family of games, the *syntactic games*, that simultaneously capture reasonable syntactic measures and the number of variables.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2023; v1 submitted 30 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
On the Number of Quantifiers as a Complexity Measure
Authors:
Ronald Fagin,
Jonathan Lenchner,
Nikhil Vyas,
Ryan Williams
Abstract:
In 1981, Neil Immerman described a two-player game, which he called the "separability game" \cite{Immerman81}, that captures the number of quantifiers needed to describe a property in first-order logic. Immerman's paper laid the groundwork for studying the number of quantifiers needed to express properties in first-order logic, but the game seemed to be too complicated to study, and the arguments…
▽ More
In 1981, Neil Immerman described a two-player game, which he called the "separability game" \cite{Immerman81}, that captures the number of quantifiers needed to describe a property in first-order logic. Immerman's paper laid the groundwork for studying the number of quantifiers needed to express properties in first-order logic, but the game seemed to be too complicated to study, and the arguments of the paper almost exclusively used quantifier rank as a lower bound on the total number of quantifiers. However, last year Fagin, Lenchner, Regan and Vyas rediscovered the games, provided some tools for analyzing them, and showed how to utilize them to characterize the number of quantifiers needed to express linear orders of different sizes. In this paper, we push forward in the study of number of quantifiers as a bona fide complexity measure by establishing several new results. First we carefully distinguish minimum number of quantifiers from the more usual descriptive complexity measures, minimum quantifier rank and minimum number of variables. Then, for each positive integer $k$, we give an explicit example of a property of finite structures (in particular, of finite graphs) that can be expressed with a sentence of quantifier rank $k$, but where the same property needs $2^{Ω(k^2)}$ quantifiers to be expressed.
△ Less
Submitted 4 July, 2022; v1 submitted 30 June, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Multi-Structural Games and Number of Quantifiers
Authors:
Ronald Fagin,
Jonathan Lenchner,
Kenneth W. Regan,
Nikhil Vyas
Abstract:
We study multi-structural games, played on two sets $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of structures. These games generalize Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games. Whereas Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games capture the quantifier rank of a first-order sentence, multi-structural games capture the number of quantifiers, in the sense that Spoiler wins the $r$-round game if and only if there is a first-order sentence $φ$ wit…
▽ More
We study multi-structural games, played on two sets $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of structures. These games generalize Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games. Whereas Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games capture the quantifier rank of a first-order sentence, multi-structural games capture the number of quantifiers, in the sense that Spoiler wins the $r$-round game if and only if there is a first-order sentence $φ$ with at most $r$ quantifiers, where every structure in $\mathcal{A}$ satisfies $φ$ and no structure in $\mathcal{B}$ satisfies $φ$. We use these games to give a complete characterization of the number of quantifiers required to distinguish linear orders of different sizes, and develop machinery for analyzing structures beyond linear orders.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2022; v1 submitted 29 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Foundations of Reasoning with Uncertainty via Real-valued Logics
Authors:
Ronald Fagin,
Ryan Riegel,
Alexander Gray
Abstract:
Real-valued logics underlie an increasing number of neuro-symbolic approaches, though typically their logical inference capabilities are characterized only qualitatively. We provide foundations for establishing the correctness and power of such systems. We give a sound and strongly complete axiomatization that can be parametrized to cover essentially every real-valued logic, including all the comm…
▽ More
Real-valued logics underlie an increasing number of neuro-symbolic approaches, though typically their logical inference capabilities are characterized only qualitatively. We provide foundations for establishing the correctness and power of such systems. We give a sound and strongly complete axiomatization that can be parametrized to cover essentially every real-valued logic, including all the common fuzzy logics. Our class of sentences are very rich, and each describes a set of possible real values for a collection of formulas of the real-valued logic, including which combinations of real values are possible. Strong completeness allows us to derive exactly what information can be inferred about the combinations of real values of a collection of formulas given information about the combinations of real values of several other collections of formulas. We then extend the axiomatization to deal with weighted subformulas. Finally, we give a decision procedure based on linear programming for deciding, for certain real-valued logics and under certain natural assumptions, whether a set of our sentences logically implies another of our sentences.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2022; v1 submitted 5 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Logical Neural Networks
Authors:
Ryan Riegel,
Alexander Gray,
Francois Luus,
Naweed Khan,
Ndivhuwo Makondo,
Ismail Yunus Akhalwaya,
Haifeng Qian,
Ronald Fagin,
Francisco Barahona,
Udit Sharma,
Shajith Ikbal,
Hima Karanam,
Sumit Neelam,
Ankita Likhyani,
Santosh Srivastava
Abstract:
We propose a novel framework seamlessly providing key properties of both neural nets (learning) and symbolic logic (knowledge and reasoning). Every neuron has a meaning as a component of a formula in a weighted real-valued logic, yielding a highly intepretable disentangled representation. Inference is omnidirectional rather than focused on predefined target variables, and corresponds to logical re…
▽ More
We propose a novel framework seamlessly providing key properties of both neural nets (learning) and symbolic logic (knowledge and reasoning). Every neuron has a meaning as a component of a formula in a weighted real-valued logic, yielding a highly intepretable disentangled representation. Inference is omnidirectional rather than focused on predefined target variables, and corresponds to logical reasoning, including classical first-order logic theorem proving as a special case. The model is end-to-end differentiable, and learning minimizes a novel loss function capturing logical contradiction, yielding resilience to inconsistent knowledge. It also enables the open-world assumption by maintaining bounds on truth values which can have probabilistic semantics, yielding resilience to incomplete knowledge.
△ Less
Submitted 23 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Recursive Programs for Document Spanners
Authors:
Liat Peterfreund,
Balder ten Cate,
Ronald Fagin,
Benny Kimelfeld
Abstract:
A document spanner models a program for Information Extraction (IE) as a function that takes as input a text document (string over a finite alphabet) and produces a relation of spans (intervals in the document) over a predefined schema. A well studied language for expressing spanners is that of the regular spanners: relational algebra over regex formulas, which are obtained by adding capture varia…
▽ More
A document spanner models a program for Information Extraction (IE) as a function that takes as input a text document (string over a finite alphabet) and produces a relation of spans (intervals in the document) over a predefined schema. A well studied language for expressing spanners is that of the regular spanners: relational algebra over regex formulas, which are obtained by adding capture variables to regular expressions. Equivalently, the regular spanners are the ones expressible in non-recursive Datalog over regex formulas (extracting relations that play the role of EDBs from the input document). In this paper, we investigate the expressive power of recursive Datalog over regex formulas. Our main result is that such programs capture precisely the document spanners computable in polynomial time. Additional results compare recursive programs to known formalisms such as the language of core spanners (that extends regular spanners by allowing to test for string equality) and its closure under difference. Finally, we extend our main result to a recently proposed framework that generalizes both the relational model and document spanners.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2018; v1 submitted 21 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
A New Approach to Updating Beliefs
Authors:
Ronald Fagin,
Joseph Y. Halpern
Abstract:
We define a new notion of conditional belief, which plays the same role for Dempster-Shafer belief functions as conditional probability does for probability functions. Our definition is different from the standard definition given by Dempster, and avoids many of the well-known problems of that definition. Just as the conditional probability Pr (lB) is a probability function which is the result o…
▽ More
We define a new notion of conditional belief, which plays the same role for Dempster-Shafer belief functions as conditional probability does for probability functions. Our definition is different from the standard definition given by Dempster, and avoids many of the well-known problems of that definition. Just as the conditional probability Pr (lB) is a probability function which is the result of conditioning on B being true, so too our conditional belief function Bel (lB) is a belief function which is the result of conditioning on B being true. We define the conditional belief as the lower envelope (that is, the inf) of a family of conditional probability functions, and provide a closed form expression for it. An alternate way of understanding our definition of conditional belief is provided by considering ideas from an earlier paper [Fagin and Halpern, 1989], where we connect belief functions with inner measures. In particular, we show here how to extend the definition of conditional probability to non measurable sets, in order to get notions of inner and outer conditional probabilities, which can be viewed as best approximations to the true conditional probability, given our lack of information. Our definition of conditional belief turns out to be an exact analogue of our definition of inner conditional probability.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2013;
originally announced April 2013.
-
Composition with Target Constraints
Authors:
Marcelo Arenas,
Ronald Fagin,
Alan Nash
Abstract:
It is known that the composition of schema mappings, each specified by source-to-target tgds (st-tgds), can be specified by a second-order tgd (SO tgd). We consider the question of what happens when target constraints are allowed. Specifically, we consider the question of specifying the composition of standard schema mappings (those specified by st-tgds, target egds, and a weakly acyclic set of t…
▽ More
It is known that the composition of schema mappings, each specified by source-to-target tgds (st-tgds), can be specified by a second-order tgd (SO tgd). We consider the question of what happens when target constraints are allowed. Specifically, we consider the question of specifying the composition of standard schema mappings (those specified by st-tgds, target egds, and a weakly acyclic set of target tgds). We show that SO tgds, even with the assistance of arbitrary source constraints and target constraints, cannot specify in general the composition of two standard schema mappings. Therefore, we introduce source-to-target second-order dependencies (st-SO dependencies), which are similar to SO tgds, but allow equations in the conclusion. We show that st-SO dependencies (along with target egds and target tgds) are sufficient to express the composition of every finite sequence of standard schema mappings, and further, every st-SO dependency specifies such a composition. In addition to this expressive power, we show that st-SO dependencies enjoy other desirable properties. In particular, they have a polynomial-time chase that generates a universal solution. This universal solution can be used to find the certain answers to unions of conjunctive queries in polynomial time. It is easy to show that the composition of an arbitrary number of standard schema mappings is equivalent to the composition of only two standard schema mappings. We show that surprisingly, the analogous result holds also for schema mappings specified by just st-tgds (no target constraints). This is proven by showing that every SO tgd is equivalent to an unnested SO tgd (one where there is no nesting of function symbols). Similarly, we prove unnesting results for st-SO dependencies, with the same types of consequences.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2011; v1 submitted 19 June, 2011;
originally announced June 2011.
-
Optimal Aggregation Algorithms for Middleware
Authors:
Ron Fagin,
Amnon Lotem,
Moni Naor
Abstract:
Let D be a database of N objects where each object has m fields. The objects are given in m sorted lists (where the ith list is sorted according to the ith field). Our goal is to find the top k objects according to a monotone aggregation function t, while minimizing access to the lists. The problem arises in several contexts. In particular Fagin (JCSS 1999) considered it for the purpose of aggre…
▽ More
Let D be a database of N objects where each object has m fields. The objects are given in m sorted lists (where the ith list is sorted according to the ith field). Our goal is to find the top k objects according to a monotone aggregation function t, while minimizing access to the lists. The problem arises in several contexts. In particular Fagin (JCSS 1999) considered it for the purpose of aggregating information in a multimedia database system.
We are interested in instance optimality, i.e. that our algorithm will be as good as any other (correct) algorithm on any instance. We provide and analyze several instance optimal algorithms for the task, with various access costs and models.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2002;
originally announced April 2002.
-
Common knowledge revisited
Authors:
R. Fagin,
J. Y. Halpern,
Y. Moses,
M. Vardi
Abstract:
We consider the common-knowledge paradox raised by Halpern and Moses: common knowledge is necessary for agreement and coordination, but common knowledge is unattainable in the real world because of temporal imprecision. We discuss two solutions to this paradox: (1) modeling the world with a coarser granularity, and (2) relaxing the requirements for coordination.
We consider the common-knowledge paradox raised by Halpern and Moses: common knowledge is necessary for agreement and coordination, but common knowledge is unattainable in the real world because of temporal imprecision. We discuss two solutions to this paradox: (1) modeling the world with a coarser granularity, and (2) relaxing the requirements for coordination.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 1998;
originally announced September 1998.
