Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Bordais, B

Learning Branching-Time Properties in CTL and ATL via Constraint Solving

Authors: Benjamin Bordais, Daniel Neider, Rajarshi Roy

Abstract: We address the problem of learning temporal properties from the branching-time behavior of systems. Existing research in this field has mostly focused on learning linear temporal properties specified using popular logics, such as Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) and Signal Temporal Logic (STL). Branching-time logics such as Computation Tree Logic (CTL) and Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL), despite… ▽ More We address the problem of learning temporal properties from the branching-time behavior of systems. Existing research in this field has mostly focused on learning linear temporal properties specified using popular logics, such as Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) and Signal Temporal Logic (STL). Branching-time logics such as Computation Tree Logic (CTL) and Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL), despite being extensively used in specifying and verifying distributed and multi-agent systems, have not received adequate attention. Thus, in this paper, we investigate the problem of learning CTL and ATL formulas from examples of system behavior. As input to the learning problems, we rely on the typical representations of branching behavior as Kripke structures and concurrent game structures, respectively. Given a sample of structures, we learn concise formulas by encoding the learning problem into a satisfiability problem, most notably by symbolically encoding both the search for prospective formulas and their fixed-point based model checking algorithms. We also study the decision problem of checking the existence of prospective ATL formulas for a given sample. We implement our algorithms in an Python prototype and have evaluated them to extract several common CTL and ATL formulas used in practical applications. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Learning Temporal Properties is NP-hard

Authors: Benjamin Bordais, Daniel Neider, Rajarshi Roy

Abstract: We investigate the complexity of LTL learning, which consists in deciding given a finite set of positive ultimately periodic words, a finite set of negative ultimately periodic words, and a bound B given in unary, if there is an LTL-formula of size less than or equal to B that all positive words satisfy and that all negative violate. We prove that this decision problem is NP-hard. We then use this… ▽ More We investigate the complexity of LTL learning, which consists in deciding given a finite set of positive ultimately periodic words, a finite set of negative ultimately periodic words, and a bound B given in unary, if there is an LTL-formula of size less than or equal to B that all positive words satisfy and that all negative violate. We prove that this decision problem is NP-hard. We then use this result to show that CTL learning is also NP-hard. CTL learning is similar to LTL learning except that words are replaced by finite Kripke structures and we look for the existence of CTL formulae. △ Less

Submitted 18 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

From Local To Global Optimality in Concurrent Parity Games

Authors: Benjamin Bordais, Patricia Bouyer, Stéphane Le Roux

Abstract: We study two-player games on finite graphs. Turn-based games have many nice properties, but concurrent games are harder to tame: e.g. turn-based stochastic parity games have positional optimal strategies, whereas even basic concurrent reachability games may fail to have optimal strategies. We study concurrent stochastic parity games, and identify a local structural condition that, when satisfied a… ▽ More We study two-player games on finite graphs. Turn-based games have many nice properties, but concurrent games are harder to tame: e.g. turn-based stochastic parity games have positional optimal strategies, whereas even basic concurrent reachability games may fail to have optimal strategies. We study concurrent stochastic parity games, and identify a local structural condition that, when satisfied at each state, guarantees existence of positional optimal strategies for both players. △ Less

Submitted 24 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Sub-game optimal strategies in concurrent games with prefix-independent objectives

Authors: Benjamin Bordais, Patricia Bouyer, Stéphane Le Roux

Abstract: We investigate concurrent two-player win/lose stochastic games on finite graphs with prefix-independent objectives. We characterize subgame optimal strategies and use this characterization to show various memory transfer results: 1) For a given (prefix-independent) objective, if every game that has a subgame almost-surely winning strategy also has a positional one, then every game that has a subga… ▽ More We investigate concurrent two-player win/lose stochastic games on finite graphs with prefix-independent objectives. We characterize subgame optimal strategies and use this characterization to show various memory transfer results: 1) For a given (prefix-independent) objective, if every game that has a subgame almost-surely winning strategy also has a positional one, then every game that has a subgame optimal strategy also has a positional one; 2) Assume that the (prefix-independent) objective has a neutral color. If every turn-based game that has a subgame almost-surely winning strategy also has a positional one, then every game that has a finite-choice (notion to be defined) subgame optimal strategy also has a positional one. We collect or design examples to show that our results are tight in several ways. We also apply our results to Büchi, co-Büchi, parity, mean-payoff objectives, thus yielding simpler statements. △ Less

Submitted 25 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Strategy Synthesis for Global Window PCTL

Authors: Benjamin Bordais, Damien Busatto-Gaston, Shibashis Guha, Jean-François Raskin

Abstract: Given a Markov decision process (MDP) $M$ and a formula $Φ$, the strategy synthesis problem asks if there exists a strategy $σ$ s.t. the resulting Markov chain $M[σ]$ satisfies $Φ$. This problem is known to be undecidable for the probabilistic temporal logic PCTL. We study a class of formulae that can be seen as a fragment of PCTL where a local, bounded horizon property is enforced all along an ex… ▽ More Given a Markov decision process (MDP) $M$ and a formula $Φ$, the strategy synthesis problem asks if there exists a strategy $σ$ s.t. the resulting Markov chain $M[σ]$ satisfies $Φ$. This problem is known to be undecidable for the probabilistic temporal logic PCTL. We study a class of formulae that can be seen as a fragment of PCTL where a local, bounded horizon property is enforced all along an execution. Moreover, we allow for linear expressions in the probabilistic inequalities. This logic is at the frontier of decidability, depending on the type of strategies considered. In particular, strategy synthesis is decidable when strategies are deterministic while the general problem is undecidable. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

ACM Class: G.3

Playing (Almost-)Optimally in Concurrent Büchi and co-Büchi Games

Authors: Benjamin Bordais, Patricia Bouyer, Stéphane Le Roux

Abstract: We study two-player concurrent stochastic games on finite graphs, with Büchi and co-Büchi objectives. The goal of the first player is to maximize the probability of satisfying the given objective. Following Martin's determinacy theorem for Blackwell games, we know that such games have a value. Natural questions are then: does there exist an optimal strategy, that is, a strategy achieving the value… ▽ More We study two-player concurrent stochastic games on finite graphs, with Büchi and co-Büchi objectives. The goal of the first player is to maximize the probability of satisfying the given objective. Following Martin's determinacy theorem for Blackwell games, we know that such games have a value. Natural questions are then: does there exist an optimal strategy, that is, a strategy achieving the value of the game? what is the memory required for playing (almost-)optimally? The situation is rather simple to describe for turn-based games, where positional pure strategies suffice to play optimally in games with parity objectives. Concurrency makes the situation intricate and heterogeneous. For most ω-regular objectives, there do indeed not exist optimal strategies in general. For some objectives (that we will mention), infinite memory might also be required for playing optimally or almost-optimally. We also provide characterizations of local interactions of the players to ensure positionality of (almost-)optimal strategies for Büchi and co-Büchi objectives. This characterization relies on properties of game forms underpinning the formalism for defining local interactions of the two players. These well-behaved game forms are like elementary bricks which, when they behave well in isolation, can be assembled in graph games and ensure the good property for the whole game. △ Less

Submitted 24 November, 2022; v1 submitted 14 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Optimal strategies in concurrent reachability games

Authors: Benjamin Bordais, Patricia Bouyer, Stéphane Le Roux

Abstract: We study two-player reachability games on finite graphs. At each state the interaction between the players is concurrent and there is a stochastic Nature. Players also play stochastically. The literature tells us that 1) Player B, who wants to avoid the target state, has a positional strategy that maximizes the probability to win (uniformly from every state) and 2) from every state, for every ε >… ▽ More We study two-player reachability games on finite graphs. At each state the interaction between the players is concurrent and there is a stochastic Nature. Players also play stochastically. The literature tells us that 1) Player B, who wants to avoid the target state, has a positional strategy that maximizes the probability to win (uniformly from every state) and 2) from every state, for every ε > 0, Player A has a strategy that maximizes up to ε the probability to win. Our work is two-fold. First, we present a double-fixed-point procedure that says from which state Player A has a strategy that maximizes (exactly) the probability to win. This is computable if Nature's probability distributions are rational. We call these states maximizable. Moreover, we show that for every ε > 0, Player A has a positional strategy that maximizes the probability to win, exactly from maximizable states and up to ε from sub-maximizable states. Second, we consider three-state games with one main state, one target, and one bin. We characterize the local interactions at the main state that guarantee the existence of an optimal Player A strategy. In this case there is a positional one. It turns out that in many-state games, these local interactions also guarantee the existence of a uniform optimal Player A strategy. In a way, these games are well-behaved by design of their elementary bricks, the local interactions. It is decidable whether a local interaction has this desirable property. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

From local to global determinacy in concurrent graph games

Authors: Benjamin Bordais, Patricia Bouyer, Stéphane Le Roux

Abstract: In general, finite concurrent two-player reachability games are only determined in a weak sense: the supremum probability to win can be approached via stochastic strategies, but cannot be realized. We introduce a class of concurrent games that are determined in a much stronger sense, and in a way, it is the larger class with this property. To this end, we introduce the notion of \emph{local inte… ▽ More In general, finite concurrent two-player reachability games are only determined in a weak sense: the supremum probability to win can be approached via stochastic strategies, but cannot be realized. We introduce a class of concurrent games that are determined in a much stronger sense, and in a way, it is the larger class with this property. To this end, we introduce the notion of \emph{local interaction} at a state of a graph game: it is a \emph{game form} whose outcomes (i.e. a table whose entries) are the next states, which depend on the concurrent actions of the players. By definition, a game form is \emph{determined} iff it always yields games that are determined via deterministic strategies when used as a local interaction in a Nature-free, one-shot reachability game. We show that if all the local interactions of a graph game with Borel objective are determined game forms, the game itself is determined: if Nature does not play, one player has a winning strategy; if Nature plays, both players have deterministic strategies that maximize the probability to win. This constitutes a clear-cut separation: either a game form behaves poorly already when used alone with basic objectives, or it behaves well even when used together with other well-behaved game forms and complex objectives. Existing results for positional and finite-memory determinacy in turn-based games are extended this way to concurrent games with determined local interactions (CG-DLI). △ Less

Submitted 8 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Expected Window Mean-Payoff

Authors: Benjamin Bordais, Shibashis Guha, Jean-François Raskin

Abstract: In the window mean-payoff objective, given an infinite path, instead of considering a long run average, we consider the minimum payoff that can be ensured at every position of the path over a finite window that slides over the entire path. Chatterjee et al. studied the problem to decide if in a two-player game, Player 1 has a strategy to ensure a window mean-payoff of at least 0. In this work, w… ▽ More In the window mean-payoff objective, given an infinite path, instead of considering a long run average, we consider the minimum payoff that can be ensured at every position of the path over a finite window that slides over the entire path. Chatterjee et al. studied the problem to decide if in a two-player game, Player 1 has a strategy to ensure a window mean-payoff of at least 0. In this work, we consider a function that given a path returns the supremum value of the window mean-payoff that can be ensured over the path and we show how to compute its expected value in Markov chains and Markov decision processes. We consider two variants of the function: Fixed window mean-payoff in which a fixed window length $l_{max}$ is provided; and Bounded window mean-payoff in which we compute the maximum possible value of the window mean-payoff over all possible window lengths. Further, for both variants, we consider (i) a direct version of the problem where for each path, the payoff that can be ensured from its very beginning and (ii) a non-direct version that is the prefix independent counterpart of the direct version of the problem. △ Less

Submitted 5 December, 2019; v1 submitted 21 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Comments: Replaced PP-hardness of direct fixed window objective with PSPACE-hardness, added alternative definition of window mean-payoff

MSC Class: Stochastic Processes ACM Class: G.3