How the continuum hypothesis could have been a fundamental axiom

Joel David Hamkins O’Hara Professor of Logic, University of Notre Dame, 100 Malloy Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA, & V. Research Fellow, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, UK. jdhamkins@nd.edu http://jdh.hamkins.org

Commentary on this article can be made on the first author’s blog at https://jdh.hamkins.org/how-ch-could-have-been-fundamental. This article follows up on a line of argument I had presented in [Hamkins2021:Lectures-on-the-philosophy-of-mathematics, p.78-79, Questions 2.18, 2.19, 2.20]. I am grateful to the anonymous referees for several helpful suggestions, as well as to Mel Fitting, Jason Chen, Tim Button, and other participants at the talks I gave on this topic at the 2024 Eastern APA, at UC Irvine, and at the University of Oslo.

\addbibresource

HamkinsBiblio,MathBiblio,WebPosts,PhilBiblio \renewbibmacroin: