Skip to main content

All Questions

Tagged with
35 votes
8 answers
28k views

Why do editors sometimes accept a paper even if a reviewer recommends rejection?

For the last many days, I have a question in mind related with the editorial decision of accepting or rejecting the manuscript after peer-review: Few days back I got a review report from a very ...
2 votes
1 answer
316 views

What can/should I do when finding several flaws in a published paper that I have not authored?

I recently read a paper that was full of small errors that should have been pointed out during peer review but very obviously hadn't. Issues like the following insufficient information in the methods ...
6 votes
2 answers
310 views

What are objectives and incentives of journal editors?

I am trying to understand better the factors that affect the decisions of journal editors (re: publication). I am not interested in strategies to boost my chances of publication, rather I want to ...
2 votes
2 answers
448 views

We appealed an editor's decision and sent a revised version, but he hasn't acknowledged it since 5 weeks

This is about a post-review rejection. This is one of the top journals in our field. The reviewers found our work interesting but sent a long list of controls and additional experiments to do. The ...
7 votes
1 answer
466 views

What is the meaning of the "eye symbol" on a corrected proof?

I have submitted my corrections of the proofs to a Wiley journal, in the corrections, I have corrected a typo in one of the equations, the typo was not made by the typesetter but rather by me, in the ...
3 votes
3 answers
1k views

Options about responding to offer from editor to transfer manuscript to lower-tier journal

I recently submitted a first-author paper to a top-tier scientific journal (A). The editor responded that the paper would not be reviewed in that specific journal (A), but that it could be transferred ...
0 votes
1 answer
2k views

2nd review round, referee did not accept the invitation - what are my options?

On a submission for a 2nd-round revise-and-resubmit in an Elsevier journal, one reviewer who did provide 2 rounds of positive feedback did not accept the invitation to re-review, 40 days after the ...
3 votes
1 answer
1k views

Preprint got published on Authorea without sending it to review (desk rejection). Is this how it is supposed to happen?

I just submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne Submission system. There was the option to agree that the manuscript will be published as a preprint on Authorea. It says: New! ...
2 votes
3 answers
2k views

How to ask politely the editor to urge the reviewers to finish the reviews in the best short time

I want to respectfully ask the editor to finish the review of my paper in the shortest time possible, because I got an early deadline to defend my thesis. Here are some details on the review process ...
42 votes
4 answers
5k views

Published papers with incorrect solutions of famous problems: how to raise concerns with editors?

I recently discovered the following two papers: Bruckman, Paul S. A proof of the Collatz conjecture. Internat. J. Math. Ed. Sci. Tech. 39 (2008), no. 3, 403–407, DOI: 10.1080/00207390701691574. ...
5 votes
2 answers
2k views

How to react when the editor responds to a withdrawal by asking for the LaTeX file?

I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but due to an issue with that I asked the Editor-in-Chief and Associate Editor to withdraw the manuscript from further consideration. The response of the Editor-...
7 votes
2 answers
3k views

The reviews are completed but the editor does not send the final decision and I am in a hurry

I have submitted a paper and both reviewers stated that the work is very well-written, novel, very well-done etc., and asked only some very easy questions. After I sent the revised version, on the ...
6 votes
3 answers
4k views

My manuscript status says "18 reviewers invited." Is it a bad sign if that many reviewers were invited to review my manuscript?

So far, that is the only information given to me by the journal. I have no idea if all 18 reviewers were invited at the same time, or if one at a time. In either cause, is this a bad sign, something ...
5 votes
1 answer
2k views

Is it common to not have comments when reviewing a revision of a paper?

After reviewing a journal paper, I typically receive the revision of the paper to review. This is expected, but most often, my comments are addressed by the authors, and I have no further comments. I ...
43 votes
3 answers
6k views

How to tell reviewers that I can't update my results

I spent a lot of time during my post-doc doing a big-data analysis using cloud credits paid for by a grant. I got the research conducted, written up, and submitted to a journal. The modeling I did ...

15 30 50 per page
1 2
3
4 5
19