I would like to cite a series of concept. For example, in this paper, the authors wrote:
The identification of prospective geothermal systems in the aseismic geologic setting is very challenging and costly using conventional techniques. The applicability of remote sensing imagery to detect spatial patterns of hydrothermal alteration minerals and thermal anomaly provides a cost-effective and useful technique for mapping geothermal features in underdeveloped countries (Kratt et al., 2010, van der Meer et al., 2014, Calvin et al., 2015, Calvin and Pace, 2016, Abubakar et al., 2017a, Abubakar et al., 2017b, Abubakar et al., 2017c, Abubakar et al., 2017a, Abubakar et al., 2017b, Abubakar et al., 2017c). Spectral remote sensing imagery produces digital images that can be used for interpretation of surface compositional features such as hydrothermally altered mineral assemblages. These minerals manifest unique spectral signatures that can be detected using remote sensing sensors (Iqbal et al., 2018, Pour et al., 2017a, Pour et al., 2017b, Pour et al., 2017a, Pour et al., 2017b, Testa et al., 2018, Ahmadirouhani et al., 2018). Iron oxide/hydroxides and hydroxyl-bearing mineral groups are by-products of metasomatism in hydrothermal systems, which serve as one of the most important indicators for mapping geothermal sites (Carranza et al., 2008, Renaut et al., 2017, van der Meer et al., 2018).
I'd like to cite the series of concept like this:
Identifying prospective geothermal sites poses significant challenges and costs when using conventional techniques (Abubakar et al., 2019). Remote sensing offers cost-effective and valuable method for identifying spatial patterns of altered minerals. It can be used to detect hydrothermally altered mineral assemblages which manifest unique spectral signatures and are important indicators for mapping geothermal sites.
Is there something wrong of directly citing them for the series of ideas instead of going through their original sources?