2

How is it possible that people which are not in academia nor affiliated with a research institution can publish on ArXiv? I know that arxiv papers are not subjected to peer review but to publish there you still need credentials or to receive the authorization from people who already publish. My question therefore is the following: how is it possible that there are so many low quality publications on Arxiv? See for example this "proof" that P ≠ NP.

3
  • 1
    While this paper is garbage, I think it's not so nice to provide a link to it.
    – Thomas
    Commented Oct 25, 2019 at 14:12
  • 1
    There are even low quality papers in high quality peer-reviewed journals..
    – Mark
    Commented Oct 25, 2019 at 15:19
  • 1
    IMO this question answers itself in respect of the specific example when you do five minutes' web searching and discover that the author was an associate professor for ten years and already had an arxiv account then. Commented Oct 26, 2019 at 6:12

1 Answer 1

4

Submissions do go through a moderation process to ensure that the paper has "refereeable content"; at minimum this means that the paper must present "original or substantive research" but it does not require that the research methodology is actually sound or that the findings are actually correct. Establishing soundness (and to a certain degree, also correctness) is the point of the full peer review process, which is something arXiv lacks by design.

In summary, the reason there are so many bad papers on arXiv is that arXiv intentionally makes it easy to post unreviewed material. If you are doing a literature review and finding high-quality papers is important for you, you would be better off browsing or searching an expertly curated list of papers, such as those contained in a journal or a volume of conference proceedings. Of course, even some bad papers can make it into such publications, though the proportion will be astronomically lower than in an (almost) free-for-all self-archiving service like arXiv.

7
  • 1
    The first part of this answer is wrong, arXiv does have an endorsement system arxiv.org/help/endorsement
    – fqq
    Commented Oct 25, 2019 at 10:20
  • 1
    @Yamar69: Even if that's true, that's a pretty low bar to pass. As you observed, there are already a lot of low-quality papers on arXiv. Surely many contributors of such papers would happily authorize other potential contributors' requests to upload their own low-quality papers.
    – Psychonaut
    Commented Oct 25, 2019 at 10:21
  • 1
    @Psychonaut it is a relatively low bar, but higher than what you describe. "Contributors of such papers" might not be able to endorse other people, not all authors are endorsers.
    – fqq
    Commented Oct 25, 2019 at 10:24
  • 1
    @fqq: Thanks for letting me know. I've revised the answer accordingly.
    – Psychonaut
    Commented Oct 25, 2019 at 10:24
  • 1
    @Yamar69 That would be an interesting new question.
    – Tommi
    Commented Oct 25, 2019 at 10:54

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .