Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • I like the idea of canonical question. Is this question exclusively about response time following initial manuscript submission or does it also include revise and resubmits? Commented Apr 21, 2017 at 11:21
  • @JeromyAnglim: I don’t see why resubmissions should be excluded. In my experience, there is little that differs for them (which may be just my field, however), so there is little reason to treat them separately.
    – Wrzlprmft
    Commented Apr 21, 2017 at 11:25
  • "Factors" probably include the editor being sick (and then unable to assign reviewers), or stepping down (which may mean restarting the entire process)... Commented Apr 22, 2017 at 14:13
  • @Anony-Mousse: only if the authors are informed about these events.
    – Wrzlprmft
    Commented Apr 22, 2017 at 15:00
  • 4
    @MikeyMike: In my experience, the time an individual referee takes to send in a review mostly depends on their priorities and duties rather than on how much time they spend on the paper. (Also see this question.)
    – Wrzlprmft
    Commented Apr 23, 2017 at 20:38