Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • 48
    Olympiads are for competition, find or inspire talent, not to open new fields of research.
    – Greg
    Commented Mar 14, 2017 at 3:57
  • 10
    If you participated, that means you will be in demand by top universities. After you get in, which shouldn't be a problem, you get better resources ($ or other liked people), and hence you will be in a better position to make significant contributions. You basically have the Matthew Effect. Commented Mar 14, 2017 at 4:52
  • 5
    Several academic colleagues I know did these types of competitions. They demonstrate interest, motivation, out-of-box thinking and many other qualities useful for research. In addition, of course, you need also long-term thinking to be successful, but some essential aspects of personality can be seen already in competitions. Commented Mar 14, 2017 at 9:16
  • 8
    Closely related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/4846/…
    – Sarastro
    Commented Mar 14, 2017 at 11:29
  • 2
    The first part of @Greg's comment supports a positive answer to the first question (interpreted broadly): yes, IMO problems contribute to math research because they inspire smart young people to pursue mathematics.
    – Kimball
    Commented Mar 14, 2017 at 21:10