Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

10
  • 1
    @FranckDernoncourt I mean, in case the authors use their real names (which I doubt). In any case I do not see why anybody would want to create noise as you say.
    – PsySp
    Commented Mar 11, 2017 at 23:57
  • 62
    I'm an arXiv moderator, and I disagree with this answer.
    – JeffE
    Commented Mar 12, 2017 at 2:36
  • 90
    @JeffE please post your own answer?
    – smci
    Commented Mar 12, 2017 at 3:14
  • 6
    @JeffE A good recipe to receove something like my last "Our volunteer moderators determined that your article does not contain sufficient original or substantive research to merit inclusion within arXiv. Resubmission of removed papers may result in the loss of your submission privileges." Commented Mar 12, 2017 at 10:44
  • 6
    @StuartGolodetz My opinion is that a joke paper, published under Machine Learning tag, is borderline qualified for spam. There are many other places where such a paper would be more appreciated and could potentially invoke less inconveniences. Because, sometimes, it's hard to judge if it's a clear joke or not.
    – PsySp
    Commented Mar 14, 2017 at 9:51