Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • 2
    This. It's not about lecture vs self-learning, it's about models how we spend time with our teachers, and if classical lectures are a good one. Another useful buzzword to Google with is flipped teaching/classroom.
    – Raphael
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 8:51
  • 3
    Umm, many (if not most) students would not pursue active learning vigorously if there were no lectures. Many would not pursue it at all, except right before exams.
    – einpoklum
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 16:01
  • 1
    Why? Weekly problems sets which are to be discussed in class would provide a schedule for students.
    – math_lover
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 19:55
  • 1
    @einpoklum Then they'd fail, and that is as it should be.
    – Raphael
    Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 9:55
  • 1
    @einpoklum I hope we can agree that those are incredibly harmful policies. Placing customer satisfaction above skill certification as a priority and designing and grading exams is a poor choice that does not lead to (only) qualified graduates. A system where such priorities are in place is broken and, frankly, makes discussing didactics obsolete (since the learning outcome is irrelevant).
    – Raphael
    Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 13:55