Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • So I am to conclude that, indeed, except in a few cases like those I mentioned, there really is no point...
    – math_lover
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 2:05
  • @JoshuaBenabou: You need to work out whether lectures are your thing. If you can get by without them, then try. One thing is that you may not know exactly what material from the book you need to learn, especially if the lectures and textbook diverge. Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 8:08
  • 3
    If you believe that you can learn quantum physics without a lecture then good luck.
    – Alexandros
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 8:29
  • Funnily enough I have worked through most of the Feynam Lectures: Volume 3 this summer. It is an introductory text, but it doesn't seem any harder to learn than, say, multivariable calculus...
    – math_lover
    Commented Sep 5, 2015 at 21:17
  • That is not say that I know quantum mechanics. I'm just pointing out that in principle a good textbook could replace a lecture to learn a topic. To master a topic you probably need the help of a teacher.
    – math_lover
    Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 16:42