Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • 1
    This sounds like a maxim. Do you have scholarly support for these statements?
    – user30980
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 1:13
  • 9
    Repetition increases retention. So then is reading the book twice just as good as reading the book and attending a lecture?
    – ff524
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 2:44
  • 5
    Getting the same info from two different sources is more effective even when wording is the same: Multiple source effect.
    – emptyother
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 4:16
  • @CreationEdge there are many published experiments addressing review. Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 4:24
  • 2
    Then shouldn't it be easy to find one to cite for your answer? Do those studies address review of different material using different mediums (such as your claim of lecture as a review of textbook?)
    – user30980
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 4:26