Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • 3
    Had you published any of the results? This may be enough to convince an admissions committee that you are worth taking a risk on. Commented Aug 10, 2012 at 8:02
  • 16
    From the limited details you provide, it seems like you'll need some far more personalized advice than we can offer you here. I'll leave the question open anyway, just in case, but I strongly suggest you seek guidance from someone qualified to answer who is more intimately aware of your situation.
    – eykanal
    Commented Aug 10, 2012 at 12:26
  • Another thing in your favour, if you had done sufficiently well and had been working for 3 or 4 years, is that you probably have developed good research skills, which would make finishing a PhD the second time around much easier. (Are you in the US? If so, there's coursework to consider as well. Maybe you can get an exception, maybe not.) Commented Aug 10, 2012 at 15:57
  • 4
    This seems to border on a legal issue.
    – Raphael
    Commented Aug 16, 2012 at 9:35
  • Some universities have a rule that you MUST complete your phd within X years of starting, and this is inflexible. Is it possible that such a rule has caught you out? Commented Dec 19, 2013 at 17:40