Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • I'd modify what you say just slightly: points 1 and 4 warrant rejection on their own, and points 2 and 3 are strong indicators that a paper should be rejected. (Admittedly, I'm coming from the perspective of a different field with quite different publishing practices.) Commented Jun 28, 2014 at 8:13
  • @MarkMeckes Agreed.
    – xLeitix
    Commented Jun 28, 2014 at 8:30