Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • 26
    it seemed to me that the recent literature didn't add much — Then you should have argued in your paper that recent literature on the topic is irrelevant, with citations to the recent literature to back up your argument.
    – JeffE
    Commented Jun 27, 2014 at 19:43
  • 8
    One of the most common hallmarks of papers by cranks and kooks is that they don't cite recent work in the field. For example, this happens with anti-relativity kooks who only cite work from 1930 and before.
    – user1482
    Commented Jun 27, 2014 at 22:51
  • Who is going to be the reviewer, if you only reference century old papers? The list of references serves as a signpost to the Editors who to assign as a reviewer.
    – Matsmath
    Commented Jul 10, 2020 at 6:50