Timeline for Is there a good site for holding online discussions of scientific papers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
29 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2021 at 22:58 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 10, 2020 at 7:14 | answer | added | Sylvain Ribault | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 24, 2018 at 11:49 | comment | added | allo | There are now several mastodon instances for science people. Have a look at them. I cannot recommend one in particular, but they seem to form a nice community currently. | |
| Aug 23, 2018 at 21:20 | answer | added | mo-user | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 29, 2015 at 10:51 | comment | added | Martin | Related discussion on MathOverflow: Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? | |
| Feb 6, 2015 at 14:59 | comment | added | Ooker | What's wrong with Reddit? | |
| Sep 19, 2014 at 7:07 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 19, 2014 at 12:58 | |||||
| Sep 19, 2014 at 4:15 | answer | added | daaxix | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 19, 2014 at 3:38 | comment | added | daaxix | You can also use google+ communities... | |
| Sep 18, 2014 at 14:43 | answer | added | Piotr Migdal | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 18, 2014 at 13:13 | history | edited | ff524 |
removed incorrect "digital libraries" tag
|
|
| Sep 18, 2014 at 13:01 | history | edited | enthu |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 8, 2014 at 4:18 | answer | added | Christian Fritz | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 12, 2013 at 6:17 | answer | added | David Ketcheson | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 4, 2012 at 15:19 | history | edited | Noble P. Abraham |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 3, 2012 at 16:38 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/231428804273401856 | ||
| Jul 12, 2012 at 0:03 | answer | added | jurassic | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 17:38 | comment | added | Artem Kaznatcheev | Why not use blogs? You can make them private if you want only group members to have access. | |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 17:11 | comment | added | Aron Ahmadia | Hi academia.se mods, this was migrated over by op's request. | |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 17:09 | history | migrated | from scicomp.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Feb 14, 2012 at 3:57 | comment | added | Jeremy Kozdon | I also stumbled across papers. Never used it, but it claims to have some social capabilities. Probably pretty limited though. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 11:06 | comment | added | David Ketcheson | You can hold a discussion in a Mendeley group, but not specifically about one paper, and the interface is lousy (think Facebook wall). | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 6:45 | comment | added | Jeremy Kozdon | Mendeley has the groups feature, but I don't think that there is a discussion feature. | |
| Feb 3, 2012 at 12:03 | comment | added | ihuston | There have been quite a few attempts at providing a comment/review system overlay on top of the arXiv, including scirate.com (defunct) and science-advisor.net. | |
| Feb 2, 2012 at 2:05 | comment | added | Peter Brune | With Google Reader you'd get tightly connected groups wherein one person in the group would share a paper from the journal/arxiv RSS feed and then a number of people would comment on it, often prompted by questions posited by the original sharer. These comments would be semi-private based upon how many people the original poster shared it with. | |
| Feb 1, 2012 at 23:03 | answer | added | Fomite | timeline score: 14 | |
| Feb 1, 2012 at 22:49 | comment | added | Bill Barth | Can you describe a little better how the discussion went on Reader and what Google+ is lacking? | |
| Feb 1, 2012 at 22:06 | comment | added | David Z | There was a site called Phygg that aimed to do this for papers on arXiv, but it shut down due to low participation. | |
| Feb 1, 2012 at 19:30 | history | asked | David Ketcheson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |