Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • That depends on individual circumstances. What are the conditions for an institutional website, what is the kind of material you want to share on that website, etc. In short, there is no answer to that question. Commented Jun 6 at 7:42
  • 1
    For Pros(1) - the institution likely contracted for a nice-looking template and gave some tips on how to fill in information. Unlikely to be ongoing institutional support to keep anything up to date.
    – Jon Custer
    Commented Jun 6 at 12:16
  • 1
    I am not sure how much I agree with the institutional pros. I have the feeling that the professional for 1. will likely be the lowest bidder, who will have to implement a website layout decided on by a committee of bureaucrats. And that also reflects on 2. In most university webpages I browsed, finding the page of any specific person was highly non-trivial without knowing which highly specific organisational sub-unit to look in. So most of the time throwing the name into a search engine is faster and thus no different to a private website.
    – mlk
    Commented Jun 6 at 12:25