Timeline for Personal advantages of being a referee once you quit science?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2014 at 20:04 | comment | added | Jonathan E. Landrum | All I know is that if I wasn't in an academic career, there's not a snowball's chance in hell I would be reviewing the papers in my area for the "fun of it" This made my day. | |
| May 13, 2014 at 16:48 | comment | added | badroit | De nada. I think reviewing is an important part of a scientific career so my answer is really in the context of having moved away from research. I added a comment to your question where I linked a related question ... here I mention some of the career benefits I've gotten from reviewing and there's some other good answers in there in that context. | |
| May 13, 2014 at 16:34 | comment | added | davidhigh | Thanks for the clear words. You, as the other answerers, don't seem to attribute a large professional value to being a referee, and this although you are in science. Thus for me, it should be even less... | |
| May 13, 2014 at 16:00 | history | answered | badroit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |