Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 1
    Basically, it boils down to whether OP has a vested interest in the matter, whether as responsible officer or as bystander interested in the integrity of the process. However, the "behind-the-scenes" information makes the OP look like they are looking for material to create damage to the target person as punishment for other wrongdoings. Anything but initiating investigation and possible punishment for the specific misdeed in question is vigilantism and morally very problematic. Cross-punishment in civilized societies is not permitted for very good reasons. Commented Mar 1 at 20:57
  • @CaptainEmacs Do you suggest I edit my answer to include some of these points? Or maybe an edit to the question? I am not sure whether vested interest is relevant or not; as per the question, they have some interest. Of course, we can read between the lines here and make assumptions about OP's position and motivation (as you have, and as I have done in my comment on the question). Commented Mar 2 at 9:03