Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

14
  • I understand why people prefers a low learning curve, WYSIWYG program like Word. But when the project is complex and they have to pick a programming language to learn, then assuming the effort to learn is the same, then why not choosing a more popular, more interactive, and intended for screens? I haven't looked closely at Quarto, but at the face of it I would put it in the same basket with webpage. Jupyter is the same: interactive and intended for screens, not papers. (I agree using "webpage" limits my options)
    – Ooker
    Commented Feb 28 at 19:04
  • 2
    Also, I would challenge this view "then why not choosing a more popular, more interactive, and intended for screens?". Popular among who? academics or the general population? Commented Feb 28 at 19:24
  • 2
    "and they have to pick a programming language to learn" Who does, for what? Commented Feb 28 at 23:05
  • 1
    @Ooker Yet, most people do just fine with Word. Commented Mar 1 at 4:51
  • 1
    @Ooker But they are, you said "researchers" ... not "researchers who use LaTeX." Commented Mar 1 at 18:58