Timeline for How can I add an animation or video to a peer review report without using "unprofessional" sites like imgur or youtube?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2023 at 16:49 | comment | added | Stuart F | You should indicate if you want a free site, which will probably have advertisements, or how much you are willing to pay. The precise video format may also be relevant, or at least what kind of resolution and length it is. Also do you want a site you can stream or embed it from or is it OK just to have it as a download, in which case any file sharing site would do. | |
| Dec 19, 2023 at 21:48 | comment | added | wizzwizz4 | @TobiasKienzler Magnet URIs are more widely supported than IPFS, with the same upsides and similar downsides. | |
| Dec 19, 2023 at 11:14 | answer | added | Leon Derczynski | timeline score: 13 | |
| Dec 18, 2023 at 21:21 | comment | added | Tobias Kienzler | You might also be interested in IPFS | |
| Dec 18, 2023 at 17:36 | vote | accept | Tom Solberg | ||
| Dec 18, 2023 at 14:56 | comment | added | ScottishTapWater | There's really nothing unprofessional about putting it on youtube... Just make sure it's unlisted | |
| Dec 18, 2023 at 11:14 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Dec 18, 2023 at 9:23 | answer | added | The Doctor | timeline score: 16 | |
| Dec 18, 2023 at 7:31 | history | edited | Sursula | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Edited the question to contain info from comment and make it less of a shopping question (which it isn't at the heart of it).
|
| Dec 18, 2023 at 3:43 | answer | added | Dan Romik | timeline score: 20 | |
| Dec 18, 2023 at 2:41 | comment | added | Steven Clontz | Providing this infrastructure is the responsibility of the journal, not the reviewer. I'd talk to the editor who requested your review to decide on the best course of action. | |
| Dec 18, 2023 at 2:36 | comment | added | Tom Solberg | @JochenGlueck that would be fine, except for e.g. file size limits and annoying things like "Windows can't open this media file". | |
| Dec 18, 2023 at 0:16 | comment | added | Anyon | I would think the suggestion by @JochenGlueck is the best option, as it ensures there is no ex parte communication between reviewer and authors. If that's not possible, maybe you could use a data repository site. There are several that can be used in a way that preserves anonymity, and have support for in-browser viewing of images and videos. | |
| Dec 17, 2023 at 23:25 | comment | added | user176372 | @TomSolberg Oh, I see. To verify: You would like to include video or image content that you made yourself in your review? Jochen should just turn his comment into an answer, then. Worst case scenario, contact the editor with whom you're corresponding to figure it out. Though also I would remark that the vast majority of possible animations and video content are unprofessional to include in this setting in math and science. I can't judge your particular field, however. | |
| Dec 17, 2023 at 23:20 | comment | added | Jochen Glueck | @TomSolberg: Why can't you just submit the animation as a separate file together with your review? | |
| Dec 17, 2023 at 22:56 | comment | added | Tom Solberg | @user176372 like, I'm writing a peer review for an article, and there's an animation that I want to share with them. But I can't embed it in a PDF, so I need to put it somewhere. YouTube just feels funny because when they watch It. They'll see Mr. Beast suggestions and a lot of other unprofessional stuff.. | |
| Dec 17, 2023 at 22:26 | comment | added | Michael Greinecker | Vimeo seems to have a slightly more professional appearance than youtube. | |
| Dec 17, 2023 at 22:26 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 25, 2023 at 3:06 | |||||
| Dec 17, 2023 at 21:56 | comment | added | user176372 | I think I'm a bit confused. Do you also incorporate references to Discord, Facebook or Twitter in reviews? The issue with those isn't the platform, it's the quality and verifiability of any factual element in the content itself. | |
| Dec 17, 2023 at 21:35 | history | edited | Tom Solberg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
| Dec 17, 2023 at 21:23 | history | asked | Tom Solberg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |