Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

12
  • 7
    I think I'm a bit confused. Do you also incorporate references to Discord, Facebook or Twitter in reviews? The issue with those isn't the platform, it's the quality and verifiability of any factual element in the content itself.
    – user176372
    Commented Dec 17, 2023 at 21:56
  • 13
    @TomSolberg: Why can't you just submit the animation as a separate file together with your review? Commented Dec 17, 2023 at 23:20
  • 3
    I would think the suggestion by @JochenGlueck is the best option, as it ensures there is no ex parte communication between reviewer and authors. If that's not possible, maybe you could use a data repository site. There are several that can be used in a way that preserves anonymity, and have support for in-browser viewing of images and videos.
    – Anyon
    Commented Dec 18, 2023 at 0:16
  • 7
    Providing this infrastructure is the responsibility of the journal, not the reviewer. I'd talk to the editor who requested your review to decide on the best course of action. Commented Dec 18, 2023 at 2:41
  • 7
    There's really nothing unprofessional about putting it on youtube... Just make sure it's unlisted Commented Dec 18, 2023 at 14:56