Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

13
  • I’ve had a paper desk rejected after 6 months. 3 weeks is nothing in journal time. Just forget about it and continue the good work. Commented Sep 8, 2023 at 2:48
  • Oh dear 6 months... Yea I'd better not thinking of it any more. Thanks for sharing your story and hope everything goes well! Commented Sep 8, 2023 at 2:55
  • this is definitely not standard, but the point is it’s very hard to get any signal about how your paper is doing from the time it has been review. Sure, longer can mean better, but I’ve had papers accepted in top journals extremely fast (say 2.5 months). Commented Sep 8, 2023 at 3:01
  • 1
    Possible duplicate of: Is my paper under review (or similar) for too long and if yes, how should I react?.
    – Wrzlprmft
    Commented Sep 8, 2023 at 5:21
  • 1
    @user3508551: Please do not make any generalisations on paper handling time as those vary considerably between fields and journals. Six months of handling time would be more than excessive for Nature (or any sub-journal thereof).
    – Wrzlprmft
    Commented Sep 8, 2023 at 5:23