Timeline for Is reading systematically collected articles one-by-one enough for publication or I should have any further stategy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2023 at 1:56 | comment | added | kosmos | This is a flawed argument. Review papers support PhD students to narrow down their research questions. For example, if someone is doing a PhD, they have already spent many years in the field and now are narrowing down to one specific area of expertise. And their review of the field could be as good as any expert. The reason this answer is getting upvoted is because the person who asked this question seems more interested in getting published than the research questions. Most of the academicians are like that including the so called 'experts'. | |
| Jun 26, 2023 at 17:40 | comment | added | BsAxUbx5KoQDEpCAqSffwGy554PSah | "People who write review articles are experts in their respective fields for a large number of years." Not necessarily. I'm doing a Systematic Literature Review as an assignment to a Master Degree course's discipline. Noone in Academia know me so far, noone has told I'm an expert in my field for decades. | |
| Apr 1, 2023 at 18:04 | comment | added | Ed V | I upvoted your answer, which is reminiscent of my downvoted answer here: academia.stackexchange.com/a/152333/109931. ;-) | |
| Apr 1, 2023 at 17:35 | history | answered | quantacad | CC BY-SA 4.0 |