Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

9
  • 3
    FYI, this situation occurs in math more than outsiders probably realize. I referenced a rather extreme example in a comment to this mathoverflow question, leading the OP to remark "I don't offhand recall any topic, at least in analysis, where basic examples and results have been rediscovered, reproved, and republished so often ...". See also Alexander Woo's answer to Finding related result in mathematics, although in this case the discussion is about results found prior to publication. Commented Feb 20, 2023 at 17:39
  • 4
    What exactly is the damage, in your view, and what statement is "erroneous"? Commented Feb 20, 2023 at 17:42
  • 9
    ... the false assumption that such a thing had not been done -- My gut reaction is that this is not all that serious, but I imagine in the future you'll be more inclined to say things like "seems not to have been done" or "we have not found this result in the literature"! Commented Feb 20, 2023 at 18:12
  • 2
    You might also want to have a look at this answer of mine to a related question. Commented Feb 20, 2023 at 18:21
  • 1
    Regarding my earlier comment "... I imagine in the future ...", the examples given in this answer are worth reading over. Commented Feb 28, 2023 at 8:58