Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • 3
    I agree with ff524's answer, but I want to add that I think this is a really terrible situation. Just yesterday I found a study with over 400 citations which, once I obtained a copy, was extremely sloppy/borderline fraudulent. Commented Apr 7, 2014 at 3:15
  • 3
    Interesting related paper on arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/1109.2272 From the abstract: "We develop a stochastic model of the citation process, which [...] shows that about 70-90% of scientific citations are copied from the lists of references used in other papers." (People who copy the reference line may still obtain and read the cited paper, but still...)
    – cbeleites
    Commented Apr 7, 2014 at 16:04
  • Related question in physics.se.
    – E.P.
    Commented May 7, 2014 at 18:17