Timeline for Can a peer review be too positive?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2021 at 6:22 | comment | added | user9482 | @riverwastaken "It is not that it is some kind of revolutionary work. But it was a simple, straightforward concept and the execution very good." That should be the core points of your review. Add some reasoning and you have a good review. There are journals where the first point would result in rejection. Take that into account. | |
| Dec 14, 2021 at 19:10 | vote | accept | riverwastaken | ||
| Dec 14, 2021 at 17:42 | comment | added | Buffy | That can work, but you have to judge it. | |
| Dec 14, 2021 at 17:34 | comment | added | riverwastaken | It is not that it is some kind of revolutionary work. But it was a simple, straightforward concept and the execution very good. There is not anything for me to judge but the methods and presentation. Should I only include such comments when addressing the editor and be more brief when addressing the authors? | |
| Dec 14, 2021 at 17:28 | history | answered | Buffy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |