Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • I'm not trying to be pedantic, but genuinely curious: when you say that there is a "non-zero overlap", is it merely a pleonasm (because overlap itself should indicate that it's non-zero) or is there some obscure field of mathematics/physics that has this weird cases that trained your mind to be specifically say when there is a non-zero overlap, in order to differentiate from those weird cases?
    – cinico
    Commented Oct 1, 2021 at 7:02
  • That's a nice comment @cinico, I think what I want to highlight here is the significant overlap between mathematics and physics, often hard to differentiate which is which and depends on perspective, compared to some other fields of physics where there is substantial use of mathematics but can't be classified as pure mathematics research. Commented Oct 1, 2021 at 7:09