Timeline for What options are there for main research contributor who doesn't agree with the order of authorship on a manuscript?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2021 at 12:11 | history | edited | Ian Sudbery | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Aug 13, 2021 at 11:47 | comment | added | Buffy | To summarize, there are three options. Someone can relent so all agree. They can continue the discussion. Any of them can block the paper. But they need to agree if they want it published. | |
| S Aug 13, 2021 at 11:34 | history | edited | xLeitix | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
changed happy to unhappy
|
| S Aug 13, 2021 at 11:34 | history | suggested | Alchimista | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
changed happy to unhappy
|
| Aug 13, 2021 at 10:17 | comment | added | Alchimista | I did upvoted. I won't to add that it happens often. Albeit not very ethical, it can have practical reason. OP: If you feel that Academia isn't in your scope, you could let it be... But my answer would be more or less like this one. Perhaps I would add that you can try to fix it with the group. They might just have assumed that first coauthorship is not as much important for you, at this stage. Let them know isn't the case. | |
| Aug 13, 2021 at 10:12 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 13, 2021 at 11:34 | |||||
| Aug 13, 2021 at 9:30 | history | answered | Ian Sudbery | CC BY-SA 4.0 |