Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 4, 2021 at 5:04 vote accept Harry Wang
Mar 2, 2021 at 15:53 comment added Buffy The PI closing you out may not violate any legal code, but it is certainly research malpractice and should be condemned.
Mar 2, 2021 at 15:50 comment added Buffy The implication is that every "author" gets a veto, not a vote. But you are encouraged to act as a colleague, not a jerk. And fighting with your doctoral advisor or other PI is not a good path to success.
Mar 2, 2021 at 15:01 comment added user133933 @HarryWang You'll have to agree as an author with publication (usually after it's accepted). If you disagree it won't be published - the journal will return the manuscript. You can reasonably expect your relationship with the other authors to deteriorate significantly at this point.
Mar 2, 2021 at 14:57 comment added Harry Wang @Libor Suppose I disagree with publication, what does that mean? Would the manuscript still be submitted?
Mar 2, 2021 at 14:50 comment added user133933 @HarryWang To clarify - the authorship order will be determined by the submitter, your choices at that point are to either agree or disagree with publication. The editor is not there to mediate your authorship dispute.
Mar 2, 2021 at 14:46 history edited user2768 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 4 characters in body
Mar 2, 2021 at 14:41 comment added user2768 @HarryWang It's up to the authors.
Mar 2, 2021 at 14:41 vote accept Harry Wang
Mar 4, 2021 at 0:19
Mar 2, 2021 at 14:40 comment added Harry Wang What would happen if no agreement is reached during renegotiation? Would the ordering have to remain as previously arranged, or do the authors take some kind of a vote, where the majority decides who takes the position of the first author?
Mar 2, 2021 at 14:40 history edited user2768 CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 10 characters in body
Mar 2, 2021 at 14:37 history edited user2768 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 475 characters in body
Mar 2, 2021 at 14:27 history answered user2768 CC BY-SA 4.0