Timeline for Recruiting coauthors for sake of the Introduction section
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2020 at 15:23 | comment | added | Azor Ahai -him- | @DaveLRenfro It doesn't sound to me like they can't find anything - they just feel overwhelmed by the idea (something I can readily sympathize with) and are frustrated because they have their results; but now need to back-fill an introduction that seems minor. | |
| Nov 4, 2020 at 8:15 | comment | added | Dave L Renfro | @Bryan Krause: I agree, and in fact I find it difficult to believe the OP cannot find many background/related publications, as to me this raises a red flag that the topic is so specialized as to likely be of very little interest to anyone. | |
| Nov 3, 2020 at 23:18 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | +1. I'd add to this that it really seems like either A) The paper is worth the effort of OP learning the background, and they should put in this effort, or B) It is not, and it's not worth publishing. I have a very hard time believing there is much useful research that requires no background in an area to complete. Maybe it requires fewer references than some magic number "30+". | |
| Nov 3, 2020 at 22:37 | history | answered | Azor Ahai -him- | CC BY-SA 4.0 |