Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • 3
    Maybe we can agree on something like this for a standard. I don't see why traditional journals are better than GitHub repositories to publish papers. In this case I'd upload the LaTeX sources to the repository and provide a link to the PDF. I'm seriously thinking about doing this, there is even some review process, and reviewers can open issues in the repository :-m This would be free for authors and provide open access, promote collaboration, etc.
    – Trylks
    Commented Nov 11, 2013 at 18:50
  • 2
    If the repo owner doesn't make their full name known, would you suggest using their GitHub user name instead? Commented Aug 30, 2016 at 16:32
  • 2
    No. I would search his real name for that username elsewhere. Commented Feb 8, 2018 at 8:50
  • 2
    Some github users do not use their real name and make it very difficult to find it.
    – qwr
    Commented May 4, 2021 at 23:57
  • 1
    @Trylks - realize your comment is from 2013, but the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS) does all of their review on github. See github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4368 for instance.
    – jkr
    Commented Jul 23, 2022 at 23:57