Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • Could you elaborate on Point 1 the independent Human Ethics committees? And elaborate on Point 2 please? From our application experience to IRB it seems there’s no difference if donor is me (student) or the PI.
    – WDC
    Commented Feb 10, 2019 at 14:32
  • 1
    Most of your answer is relevant for future actions and does not address correcting a past action.
    – Solar Mike
    Commented Feb 10, 2019 at 14:34
  • 4
    It would almost certainly be against the rules of the OP's institution to seek permission from an independent IRB for this research as a way to avoid dealing with the institution's IRB. Commented Feb 10, 2019 at 17:26
  • 2
    @BrianBorchers OP had mentioned that the paper is on the Algorithm and Software and that the experiment was trivial, using blood of the OP only. In most Universities, such experiments (say, at a very initial, preliminary or small pilot stages) are exempted from getting Ethics clearances. The parameters for applying for ethics is involvement of human or animal subjects. If the quantity of biological tissue/fluid needed is very small, for e.g. a prick or drop of blood from the investigator itself, it qualifies in most places for waivers. This can be confirmed by any ethics committee. Commented Feb 10, 2019 at 18:41
  • 3
    @Jagan Mohan. At my US based institution, the IRB (I'm a member of the IRB) would certainly require approval before the first blood sample was taken. Commented Feb 10, 2019 at 19:40