Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

16
  • 12
    +1...There are in fact onerous protocols for experimentation on vertebrate animals, but invertebrates are pretty much fair game. I'd also be surprised if there weren't open source databases of images of animal or human blood...a quick search reveals one on Kaggle, though no idea if that would be suitable for OP's needs
    – cag51
    Commented Feb 10, 2019 at 1:10
  • 1
    @cag51 - My thought was that if an animal such as a dog were having blood drawn for testing, a small amount might be diverted to the OP, and the result might (or, of course, might not) be exempt from "experimental" protocols. After all, no experiments are being done on the dog. Commented Feb 10, 2019 at 1:13
  • 19
    Though I am no expert on animal testing, I think using a dog as you describe would lead to pretty much exactly the same type of problem that OP has now -- it seems trivial, but there are a ton of rules. Even filling out a survey requires an IRB, for reasons I've never accepted. But invertebrate blood might work, there are ~no rules on invertebrates.
    – cag51
    Commented Feb 10, 2019 at 1:17
  • 10
    @cag51 - Sheer vertabratism at its worst. We should form a committee to protest. Commented Feb 10, 2019 at 1:20
  • 15
    @JamesMartin I'd join your protest but, honestly, I don't have the backbone... Commented Feb 10, 2019 at 17:06