I am from Computer Science (CS) doing microscopy imaging applications, mainly in software side.
Recently we submitted a paper to Scientific Reports on a new algorithm. My own human blood cells (a few tiny drops of blood) were used in the experiments. The experiments are extremely trivial.
However, our paper got quality checked, from the Journal Editor:
Authors reporting experiments on humans and/or the use of human tissue samples must confirm that all experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Additionally the article file must include a statement identifying the institutional and/or licensing committee approving the experiments, including any relevant details, in the “Methods” section. Please check that the information provided in the methods section is unambiguous using the following requirements:
- A statement to confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
- A statement to confirm that all experimental protocols were approved by a named institutional and/or licensing committee.
- Must include a sentence confirming that informed consent was obtained from all subjects or, if subjects are under 18, from a parent
and/or legal guardian.
Briefly speaking, we need a bioethics statement that says, the blood in the experiments is approved by the University and the donor (which is me).
However, we are from CS and the University bio-ethics committee asked us to build a bio-safe lab before providing such license to us. This is time-consuming, costly, and far beyond our scope. Worse, there is no available human blood cells in the University for now. And I do not want to delay the paper submission.
My questions:
How can I by-pass the bio-ethics statement? Would there be any law issues? I am the donor and I approve any usage of my own blood. Why would there be an issue?
What are the proper, canonical, professional way of handling this?