Timeline for How do you judge the quality of a journal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2018 at 16:15 | comment | added | user23776 | "As of late January 2017, Beall's list has been taken down." If it's not yet available again, over a year later, you should delete this answer. And if it is back, let's suppose Beall answers this question; what do they do? | |
| Jan 24, 2017 at 19:14 | history | edited | David Ketcheson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 74 characters in body
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 16:40 | comment | added | WetlabStudent | Beall's list does more good than bad, but it is based on subjective intuition, not data or transparent criteria. It lists Frontiers, and I know of many reputable academic editors and reviewers who provide high-quality reviews for their journals. The controversy [nature.com/news/…. A better procedure: check if it's on Beal's list, if listed, check if it is on the open access whitelist [nature.com/news/open-access-website-gets-tough-1.15674]. If on both further investigation may be needed. | |
| S May 4, 2013 at 19:47 | history | suggested | Ari B. Friedman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed dead link to working one
|
| May 4, 2013 at 19:38 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 4, 2013 at 19:47 | |||||
| Feb 15, 2012 at 23:19 | comment | added | JRN | A very good and useful link! | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 17:08 | history | answered | David Ketcheson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |