Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

9
  • 1
    yep, it works with legacy USB speeds using legacy cords. Commented Jul 7, 2015 at 15:42
  • 1
    @arielnmz: To achieve USB 3 speeds, the specs define the performance characteristics the wire needs to meet. I'm not familiar with whether UTP could meet the requirements, but the spec is here: intel.com/content/dam/doc/technical-specification/…
    – fixer1234
    Commented Jul 7, 2015 at 16:13
  • 4
    And note the reverse on power: I have a USB2 device that draws too much power, it originally had a two-headed cable that let it draw power from two ports at once. Now it's fed from a single USB3 port with no gripes about drawing too much. Commented Jul 7, 2015 at 21:31
  • 2
    @Bilo: If you plug it into a USB 3 port it should work (a USB 2 port limits the current output to 500mA). But that's a waste of a USB 3 port. You would be better off getting a USB 3 enclosure for the drive and taking advantage of 10x the speed.
    – fixer1234
    Commented Jul 11, 2015 at 3:44
  • 1
    @JosephRogers, you're right. The USB port will be a bottleneck as long as it's slower than the peak transfer rate. You don't need to saturate it; performance will be degraded if the peaks exceed the bandwidth. On a good hard drive, that can be several times the USB 2.0 limit. With a good drive, you can benefit from USB 3.0's 10X speed, but you won't realize 10x the transfer rate. That was poor wording in my comment.
    – fixer1234
    Commented Oct 3, 2018 at 16:32