Timeline for Are IP addresses with and without leading zeroes the same?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
29 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6 at 17:52 | history | protected | Ramhound | ||
| Mar 17, 2019 at 23:16 | vote | accept | Brock Vond | ||
| Jul 15, 2017 at 18:07 | comment | added | TOOGAM | For more fun with doing things in an absurd way, ping 67240450 and also ping 134744072 | |
| Jul 15, 2017 at 16:13 | comment | added | Arjan | Can you please accept another answer? The one you accepted is really wrong (or at least incomplete) and has 11 downvotes. | |
| Jul 15, 2017 at 15:30 | answer | added | Christoph Lösch | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 18, 2016 at 6:27 | answer | added | Nick Gar | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 14:20 | answer | added | YetAnotherRandomUser | timeline score: -4 | |
| Jan 24, 2015 at 13:31 | audit | First posts | |||
| Jan 24, 2015 at 13:31 | |||||
| Jan 21, 2015 at 10:34 | audit | First posts | |||
| Jan 21, 2015 at 10:34 | |||||
| Jan 1, 2015 at 4:40 | comment | added | Tim S. |
All IP(v4) addresses are really just 32 bits represented in a nice way. If 192.168.002.100 is how your tool represents 0xc0a80264/3232236132 /192.168.2.100, then it's the same thing.
|
|
| Dec 30, 2014 at 18:54 | answer | added | kasperd | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 30, 2014 at 8:18 | answer | added | Jonathon Reinhart | timeline score: 14 | |
| Dec 29, 2014 at 17:51 | comment | added | ps2goat |
This can be software specific, too. They are valid with or without the leading 0s, but I've run into some applications not supporting an IP address that didn't have 3 digits in each octet.
|
|
| Dec 29, 2014 at 13:37 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | That really is quite a bizarre validation. I'd switch security systems, as @Hagen alludes to. | |
| Dec 28, 2014 at 23:30 | history | edited | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Copy edited.
|
| Dec 28, 2014 at 19:24 | comment | added | Hagen von Eitzen |
Accoerding to the answers below, 192.168.020.100 should not be the same as 192.168.20.100, but it may be the same if your system allows IPs only to be entered this way (I have seen this with copiers when the IP is entered digit by digit with up-down-arrows). - If your system has that quirk even when "normal" keyboard input is possible (i.e., you can technicall input 192.168.2.100, but it complains), then I suggest you have a word with the vendor (How trustworthy is the security system if its input validation is so crappy?)
|
|
| Dec 28, 2014 at 17:42 | answer | added | cde | timeline score: 37 | |
| Dec 28, 2014 at 7:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/549102953853100032 | ||
| Dec 28, 2014 at 5:59 | history | edited | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 65 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| S Dec 28, 2014 at 4:17 | history | edited | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved grammar, formatting, title
|
| S Dec 28, 2014 at 4:17 | history | suggested | I say Reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved grammar, formatting, title
|
| Dec 28, 2014 at 4:08 | answer | added | Greenstone Walker | timeline score: 104 | |
| Dec 28, 2014 at 3:18 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 28, 2014 at 4:17 | |||||
| Dec 28, 2014 at 3:06 | vote | accept | Brock Vond | ||
| Mar 17, 2019 at 23:16 | |||||
| Dec 28, 2014 at 2:56 | answer | added | Austin T French | timeline score: 66 | |
| Dec 28, 2014 at 2:52 | answer | added | RenegadeX | timeline score: -13 | |
| Dec 28, 2014 at 2:47 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 28, 2014 at 3:20 | |||||
| Dec 28, 2014 at 2:46 | answer | added | xR34P3Rx | timeline score: -6 | |
| Dec 28, 2014 at 2:45 | history | asked | Brock Vond | CC BY-SA 3.0 |